Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From the London Roadworks register:



View on map LR00465000827 Forest Hill Road, London. FOREST HILL ROAD BETWEEEN MARMORA ROAD AND BRENCHLEY GARDENS. Works Proposed Southwark

020 7525 2000

Web Site

Southwark MODIFICATION TO EXISTING SIGNALS AND ROAD LAYOUT TO IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY. INTRODUCTION OF CENTRAL RES ... 01/07/2013

to

30/09/2013


The council consulted on these plans about six months ago. Mostly for safety reasons after a couple of high speed, late night crashes. Some of the planned changes seemed good to me but others pretty superfluous. Can't believe it's scheduled for 3 months though!

There has just been what looks like a serious accident at the junction of Brenchley Gardens and Forest Hill Road. The road is closed off and a number of fire engines are in attendance. Seems as if the proposed work to improve road safety is long overdue.

Thanks sheilarose - when I responded to the consultation, that's exactly the junction that I felt needed a really good look at. I find it terrifying the way some people pull out and the speeds they go and I'm a fairly confident driver.


In contrast, the Wood Vale/Forest Hill road junction has lights and space for pedestrians to cross, so didn't see why it was planned to be redone at all.


LwL, I might have posted a link at the time, will see if I can find it.


Edited for spelling!

Here you go, think the link in my post is still live.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,851361,852013#msg-852013


I only found out about it from walking past the consultation posters, even though I live nearby. It looks like the whole thing is going ahead without any amendment, so guessing either not many other people responded or the vast majority were in favour of the whole program.

This is a very long time coming. I grew up on the Forest Hill Road junction with Brenchley Gardens and it's been a blackspot for as long as I can remember, my Mum showed me the plans the other day and it all looks pretty sensible, It will be worth 3 months of being put out if it stops so many accidents.

Vik, the plans that Siduhe found don't seem to address any of the problems with the Brenchley Gardens junction, as far as I can see. In fact, they look like narrowing that junction so the queues would just get longer and drivers more frustrated as cars waiting to turn right would hold up all the traffic wanting to turn left out of Brenchley. And there is nothing suggested for Canonbie Road just opposite, which is a very difficult turn if you want to go across to Brenchley or vice versa. I prefer not to do it and use Netherby road instead (if its not school pick up/drop off time, which is another law unto itself).


I guess that the Canonbie/Brenchley junction issue isn't addressed because that crosses the boundary between Southwark and Lewisham - and of course there's no way they could work together! :)

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> In contrast, the Wood Vale/Forest Hill road

> junction has lights and space for pedestrians to

> cross, so didn't see why it was planned to be

> redone at all.

>


If you are crossing Wood Vale as a pedestrian going downhill (west), it's a bit crap because you can't see traffic behind you turning left into Wood Vale, and you can't really tell when traffic on Wood Vale will get moving with the green light. Hopefully there will be a green/red man, and the traffic lights on Wood Vale more visible to somebody standing on the corner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax?  Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT). 
    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...