Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Season 1 = Massive advertising campaign, in the press, clips shown on tv, billboards etc. I remember seeing a giant poster under Herne Hill railway bridge.

It was shown at 10pm on a Sunday night, which is a peak viewing slot.


Season 2 = Advertised briefly in the press & a few trailers shown on tv.

Moved to a Monday night at 10pm, so obviously viewing figures won't be as good.


Season 3 = Nothing! I only knew it was on because it was due back in the summer, so I was checking tv schedules. I didn't even see it advertised on the channel itself.

Episode one, 11 pm, Saturday night. Great, except the following Saturday, everybody sat down to watch episode two, only to find 'Big Brother' instead. No explanation, even though it was advertised in all the tv mags/papers etc.


Apparently due to poor viewing figures after the first episode, they decided to move it to Mon at midnight, with a repeat on 5* on Sunday. After one episode? What a joke!


There were hundreds of complaints on the Channel 5 website, resulting in the main episodes now being shown on Sun at 10pm on 5*, followed by the repeat at midnight Monday.


I've not missed this once since it began & am really annoyed that the programme isn't being given the recognition & airtime it deserves.


It is really popular in the US & could be the same here, if Channel 5 bothered to promote it properly.


Next they'll be saying they won't be buying the next series, due to poor viewing figures.


They did exactly the same with 'Dallas'.

Halfway through the second season, they decided to change the timeslot from 9pm to 11pm & most people switched off.


They really haven't got a clue.

I like to think Lori is really dead, easily the most annoying character in the show. You might want to put a spoiler warning on your original post though AM!

I watched the first series last year and thought it was ok but soon lost interest in following it. I picked up the 2nd and third seasons after a friend told me that it got better. It did, the characters are infinitely more developed and the plotting keeps you guessing. I thought it was very good.

bon3yard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like to think Lori is really dead, easily the

> most annoying character in the show. You might

> want to put a spoiler warning on your original

> post though AM!

> I watched the first series last year and thought

> it was ok but soon lost interest in following it.

> I picked up the 2nd and third seasons after a

> friend told me that it got better. It did, the

> characters are infinitely more developed and the

> plotting keeps you guessing. I thought it was very

> good.



Edited to add spoilers!

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...