Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Also gutted I wasn't at the Lane yesterday. I didn't have enough membership loyalty points and gave myself a budget of ?400 to get a ticket online. In the end that would've paid for about half a ticket.



Still, some great memories from the 35 years i've been going and seen some amazing players in that time (Hoddle- the greatest, Ardiles, Mabbutt, Lineker, Gazza, Waddle, Ginola, Klinsmann, Sheringham, Ledley King, Bale, Modric, Peter Crouch, Eriksen, Kane, Alli).

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A few predictors seemed to be heart over head. We

> are all filled with hope at the beginning of a new

> season I guess.


I dunno. The bookies pre-season odds were like a lot of the predictions. They had Spurs as 6th favourites for the league, behind the rest of the top 6. They assumed that City and United would both improve under Pep and Maureen as we all probably did. They probably thought that Klopp, in his second season, would impress more particularly with no european football as a distraction.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A few predictors seemed to be heart over head.

> We

> > are all filled with hope at the beginning of a

> new

> > season I guess.

>

> I dunno.


To win the league the predictions were:


RD: Man United

Otta: Liverpool

Jah: Spurs

PD: Arsenal

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > A few predictors seemed to be heart over

> head.

> > We

> > > are all filled with hope at the beginning of

> a

> > new

> > > season I guess.

> >

> > I dunno.

>

> To win the league the predictions were:

>

> RD: Man United

> Otta: Liverpool

> Jah: Spurs

> PD: Arsenal



????: Chelsea - no sentiment from me with those tossers

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > A few predictors seemed to be heart over

> head.

> > We

> > > are all filled with hope at the beginning of

> a

> > new

> > > season I guess.

> >

> > I dunno.

>

> To win the league the predictions were:

>

> RD: Man United

> Otta: Liverpool

> Jah: Spurs

> PD: Arsenal


Ah, apologies. I get you.

You'll be in Europe next year too!


I think next season Man U will be competitive again, Chelsea clearly,Spuds if they keep Ponch and key players...Arsenal may well not be in Champions League which could help; Guardiola should turn City round - can't see Liverpool being Champs. Sorry Otts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Retrospective bans next season for simulation...

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39962886


Will be interesting to see how this is interpreted - probably it will have to be very obvious, but imo should include "anticipating a challenge" where people fall into a goalkeeper's arm etc, which they could easily have avoided ...its becoming ridiculous


I blame Anders Limpar for the whole thing.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> David Moyes has resigned.

>

> I keep hearing the Stormzy lyric "I come to your

> team and I f*ck sh*t up, I'm David Moyes".



A Sunderland fan writes...


?Moyes couldn?t show any respect to the fans & clap them after a season of s***e, but agrees to putting the ball out for John Terry. F**k off.? :)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently Moyes has resigned without request for

> compensation, which if true, is a very decent

> thing to do in the greedy world of football.


Agreed.


Also, apparently Mr Redknapp told the Birmingham powers that be that he didn't want paying if he didn't keep them up.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's because the useless fooker is in effect

> still being paid by Utd. He's a shit manager and I

> doubt very much he'll be managing in the PL

> anytime soon...



Agreed. He earned a rep at Everton, but when you look at them since he left you have to wonder if he wasn't holding them back a bit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...