Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > >.

> > > Personally I think people should be able to

> keep

> > quiet for a minute as a mark of respect to

> those

> > who it means something to.

> >

> >

> >

> > AM I do know the history. Read my last post.

> My

> > point is exactly the same as the one you made

> > earlier. I'm not asking them to wear a poppy or

> > change their views, but just to " keep quiet for

> a

> > minute as a mark of respect to those who it

> means

> > something to" (your words).

> >

> > We seem to agree yet you're trying to argue

> with

> > me.

>

>

> Yeah but there wasn't a minutes silence at Ross

> County. You write as if there were and it was

> abused by Celtic fans.

> You're speculating as to what might have happened.


The fact they have spoiled so many in the past probably means they'd have done it again.


Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------

>

>



I was at this match. It was a pre season friendly at the Emirates. The army were there for some sort of "Gunners" presentation after the match and were asked to sit behind the goal in front of the Celtic fans prior to the final whistle. An oversight by Arsenal.

Nothing to do with remembrance. Anyway we have done it to death now.

Back in your box.

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

Who the hell are you to tell me or anyone else that we're finished on a certain topic. You really do think a lot of yourself.


Typical Celtic response - always blame everyone else than acknowledging the scum bags in your support. So that reaction was Arsenal's fault?! Fu*k right off.


Singing songs about the death of Lee Rigsby was probably Brentford's fault too huh?

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who the hell are you to tell me or anyone else

> that we're finished on a certain topic. You really

> do think a lot of yourself.

>

> Typical Celtic response - always blame everyone

> else than acknowledging the scum bags in your

> support. So that reaction was Arsenal's fault?!

> Fu*k right off.

>

> Singing songs about the death of Lee Rigsby was

> probably Brentford's fault too huh?


Well, that's twice I've been told to fuck off today. Ho hum.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who the hell are you to tell me or anyone else

> that we're finished on a certain topic. You really

> do think a lot of yourself.

>

> Typical Celtic response - always blame everyone

> else than acknowledging the scum bags in your

> support. So that reaction was Arsenal's fault?!

> Fu*k right off.

>

> Singing songs about the death of Lee Rigsby was

> probably Brentford's fault too huh?


If only you were a Catholic you'd probably be the Pope by now.

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mick I don't think Jah ever told YOU to fuck off. It's pretty clear the group he was referring to it wasn't a personal attack.


Yes he's my friend and yes I'm sticking up for him, but I'm also saying it as I read it. The only personal thing earlier was AM suggesting Jah was hungover.


But can we all just talk about footy now.


Looking forward to MOTD. BBC website suggests Arsenal never really turned up, , especially in the first half.

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

What are you lot like.


I post something relevant - Mourinho is an arse


Then slag you lot off as per usual for not supporting local teams


Then give you my one experience of Parkhead which was frighteningly anti-English


And you go on bitching about each other.


Now back to important matters.


Mourinho is an arse. Yes or no.


Support your local team. Yes of no.


Admire Malumbu being the only Englishman in the Jungle at Parkehead. Yes or no.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...