Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He then went on to much bigger and better

> things.

>

> He was also one of the first players to walk away

> from a club for nothing, by virtue of being out of

> contract.



Going to some shabby outfit called AS Monaco, I bet he was gutted.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Team were boo-ed off when 1-0 up at half-time and

> boo-ed off at the end. A game of thumpball again

> with no imagination just lump it upfield - and it

> still took a penalty (dubious) and a freak

> own-goal to win.

>

> I think it's good to see BFS's boast that 'they'll

> change their tune when we win a couple of games'

> and the feeling behind it (that all fans care

> about is winning at any cost) is shattered.

>

> Neither he, nor a lot of the players, pundits,

> commentators - in fact anyone who earns a living

> through football and makes money out of it (rather

> than puts their own money IN) - can grasp the fact

> that some fans want a bit more for their

> hard-earned and from the club they love.

>

> Ultimately for Gold & Sullivan the fans are the

> customers and they aint happy and they won't keep

> paying for what they don't want - and G&S are

> businessmen. Which is a roundabout way of saying

> you may be right - and I hope to @#$%& you are.



Just read about and seen the photo of BFS cupping his ear to the fans.

He's toast. Now don't go and ruin it all by appointing Malky Mackay...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


Misguided. Supporters should support the team during the game and if they want to show any disapproval, do it after the final whistle. Even then, they should at least wait until we're out of the CL and the season is over...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


It can't end well for anyone involved.


It's spectacularly embarrassing.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to

> be

> > flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800

> by

> > fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.

>

> It can't end well for anyone involved.

>

> It's spectacularly embarrassing.


Greater Manchester Police have just announced that a 'no-fly zone' has been put in place over Old Trafford. Chief Spokesman Robin Banks advised that the police have still not accounted for the whereabouts of a football last seen leaving the stadium during a match versus Sunderland in the Capital One Cup, and therefore can not guarantee the safety of any low flying aircraft.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >..... Now don't go and ruin it all by

> > appointing Malky Mackay...

>

>

> There are (barely audible as yet) Michael Laudrup

> whispers...



... apparently some chap called Moyes might also be in the running?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10727626/Sam-Allardyces-future-at-West-Ham-is-under-threat-even-if-he-saves-club-from-relegation-this-season.html

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bhoy in Singapore Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 45 - 0 nuff said

>

>

> Think you might need to say something more BiS...


Think it's 45 titles to us and 0 to the newly formed club next door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...