Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He then went on to much bigger and better

> things.

>

> He was also one of the first players to walk away

> from a club for nothing, by virtue of being out of

> contract.



Going to some shabby outfit called AS Monaco, I bet he was gutted.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Team were boo-ed off when 1-0 up at half-time and

> boo-ed off at the end. A game of thumpball again

> with no imagination just lump it upfield - and it

> still took a penalty (dubious) and a freak

> own-goal to win.

>

> I think it's good to see BFS's boast that 'they'll

> change their tune when we win a couple of games'

> and the feeling behind it (that all fans care

> about is winning at any cost) is shattered.

>

> Neither he, nor a lot of the players, pundits,

> commentators - in fact anyone who earns a living

> through football and makes money out of it (rather

> than puts their own money IN) - can grasp the fact

> that some fans want a bit more for their

> hard-earned and from the club they love.

>

> Ultimately for Gold & Sullivan the fans are the

> customers and they aint happy and they won't keep

> paying for what they don't want - and G&S are

> businessmen. Which is a roundabout way of saying

> you may be right - and I hope to @#$%& you are.



Just read about and seen the photo of BFS cupping his ear to the fans.

He's toast. Now don't go and ruin it all by appointing Malky Mackay...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


Misguided. Supporters should support the team during the game and if they want to show any disapproval, do it after the final whistle. Even then, they should at least wait until we're out of the CL and the season is over...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


It can't end well for anyone involved.


It's spectacularly embarrassing.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to

> be

> > flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800

> by

> > fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.

>

> It can't end well for anyone involved.

>

> It's spectacularly embarrassing.


Greater Manchester Police have just announced that a 'no-fly zone' has been put in place over Old Trafford. Chief Spokesman Robin Banks advised that the police have still not accounted for the whereabouts of a football last seen leaving the stadium during a match versus Sunderland in the Capital One Cup, and therefore can not guarantee the safety of any low flying aircraft.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >..... Now don't go and ruin it all by

> > appointing Malky Mackay...

>

>

> There are (barely audible as yet) Michael Laudrup

> whispers...



... apparently some chap called Moyes might also be in the running?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10727626/Sam-Allardyces-future-at-West-Ham-is-under-threat-even-if-he-saves-club-from-relegation-this-season.html

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bhoy in Singapore Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 45 - 0 nuff said

>

>

> Think you might need to say something more BiS...


Think it's 45 titles to us and 0 to the newly formed club next door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...