Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly that RD - don't want to get all unnecessary to find Allardyce has been offered a new contract.


Sorry Teddy has gone but wish him luck as Stevenage Manager - his leaving means we need an attack-minded or at least attack-savvy manager.


If rumours are true Benitez is possibly going to Real so Bilic is front runner but might be too Bolshie (Independent) for SulliGold - wasn't too disappointed that Moyes ruled himself out - hope the McClaren rumours are way off.


Apparently they are trying hard with Klopp but can't see that happening. Oh, and Seville boss Emery is 'in talks' for the post - but then so is everyone*.


Bilic or Emery would be good.



*except Garry Monk AqM :)

So it seems Rogers might keep his job, what do people think?


It's a difficult one for me. We've really missed Sturridge, and that's no one's fault, but the signings have largely been bloody shocking.


I feel REALLY sorry for Ricky Lambert who must go to bed every night wishing he'd stayed put at the saints. Balotelli provided some entertainment, but does not fit Roger's style (which begs the question why he was brought in in the first place).


Dejan Lovren (who I admit to having high hopes for) has basically been shit.




And RD, do you reckon DiMaria will stay at United?


And will Walcott stay at Arsenal???


Sterling can jog on.

Last season Liverpool did a Spurs. Bought nine players, most of whom turned out to be flops. It can take time for young foreign players to settle, old ones too in some cases and some that never will and get shipped back out again as will be the case at WHL.

At Spurs it was Baldini and Levy's fault in paying for seven players most of whom have turned out to be duds. At Liverpool the buck stops with Brendan Rodgers. I think he should be given another season but with someone like Jurgen Klopp available it must be tempting for the owners to pull the trap door on him.


*

*

*


Just seen that West Ham have won place in the Europa League via the fair play rules. Ha! Apart from a new manager you'll need to buy double the amount of players you were already thinking of buying just to cope with the extra games. Your season starts 37 days time so good luck with that.

It seems to have been years that he's wanted to be the centre forward, and yet Wenger has never really trusted in him enough to give him a run at it.



RE Liverpool, Klopp wants a 6 month break, so let's see how Rogers starts the campaign then replace in January if necessary...

Watch Falcao go to another club and start scoring for fun. I can see City, Chelsea and Arsenal adding to their squads , as they have guaranteed CMPL football next season and as such will be attractive options to top players, and can't see beyond those for the title. Sterling will do a Shaun Wright Phillips and his career will nose dive. Liverpool ? More of the same

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Chelsea, City, Arsenal, Irons......

> >

> >

> >

> > I'm joking of course, Chelsea will blow up

>

> Not bad quids 3 out of 4


Thanks. I had a small bet on it too :)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> RE Liverpool, Klopp wants a 6 month break, so

> let's see how Rogers starts the campaign then

> replace in January if necessary...


From the BBC Gossip page, Klopp has abandoned his idea of a 6-month break. I hope he doesn't end up at LFC...I like the guy!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...