Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm glad this message has been posted as I too, saw the other locked thread and was sad to think it might damage G&F's reputation. I've always thought the staff there have been great - I went in just after my baby was born to choose an outfit for a wedding and the owner was lovely - really taking the time to help and clucking gratifyingly over the baby (this must be the hardest part of being a shopkeeper in ED, having to be endlessly pleasant to a constant stream of baldie babies and snotty-nosed kids). Been in there many times since and always found them friendly. It's my nick-nack shop of choice!
Nice post to put under the title "The people who work at Grace & Favour are fab" Spangles30 but it seems typically negative. Every time I've been in Grace & Favour, which to be honest isn't very often i.e. only on special occasions, they've been perfectly friendly and helpful.

It wasn't the negativity that stood out for me - in itself being negative doesn't make one wrong but the "Lambast me if you will, but I am entitled to my opinion"


I'm not lambasting you spangles - I just wonder why you feel the need to put that in there - it seems overly defensive (and yet aware)

I have no doubt that the people are 'friendly'. I would be 'friendly' if I was charging those prices and people were paying them.

'it seems typically negative'? Ok sorry. I realise one has to be overly sycophantic and obsequious here. thanks for reminding me 'Mark' and 'Sean' (why am I not surprised you popped up'? LOL.

Ok, back to G&F - I too have found the staff in there very pleasant, friendly and helpful. I don't go in there too often but when I do I'm never disappointed. There are number of other shops in ED who would benefit from learning a thing or two from G&F's.

I know Rosie quite well, so I am biased, but I think she is a lovely lady, and very nice to people. I don't exactly shop in these types of places, but I went in there to buy a birthday gift for a female friend, and she really helped (me being a tad rubbish at this type of thing).


With regards the prices, I wouldn't pay a fiver for a bar of soap, but I wouldn't moan about it either, if there are people who will, then good for them, and good for the shop for supplying it, and making a profit. Besides, what is business about? Know your customers and give them what they want. They are obviously doing that, because they are still open.


I went to Rye for a weekend last year, and walked in to a similar style of shop, and they had soap for A LOT more than that, so it's not exclusive to Dulwich!

Think Rose is pretty savvy and when people really cannot afford things in her shop she'll cut her cloth accordingly. She's only doing what most independent shops do, catering for an existing market: supply and demand. It's not her job to be a charity.


She was the second decent place to open on Northcross Road, way back in the 90's -I was her first customer- and has helped to make ED a more interesting place. Many of the other nick nack shops merely followed in her wake. Of all of them she has, in my view, been the most original because she was the first.


Just pray that the credit crunch doesn't wipe people like her out, because any vaccuum is bound to be filled by the outfits that can afford it, the chains. I don't want to live on another homogenised high street, or one filled with pound stores.


Finally, though I'm sure she can take it, it must be tough to read such unfettered criticism over what sounded like quite a small incident.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...