Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Come on Alan, that's such an open question there's no true answer.

More than obviously in some cases the costs are compensated and other cases they are not.

Without specifics you can't reasonably expect a useful answer unless someone lists all possible scenarios for you.

What's the property size/location/value/outstanding mortgage/general condition/freehold status/planning options/cost of works/projected sale value after works/anticipated quality of completed works/is it rented/loss of rental during works/anticipated duration of works/completion date of works/expected change in facilities or accommodation/additional borrowing you'll need to undertake the works ?

Alan if you want to chat on it PM me, I'm not an expert but have 2x such projects in various stages of progress so may able to help to some extent.

Rule of thumb is probably based on one's own needs / what exactly you're trying to achieve and in what timeframe.

My ex-neighbours had their house painted throughout and then the new owners gutted it. I think it's always good to ask as many people you can what they think. Sometimes it is not obvious to us exactly how others would view our homes.
Thanks for the offer KK and I may take you up on it a little bit further down the line. I've yet to tell the OH and son I'd like to move. We need more space and frankly that means moving out of ED, maximising the selling price and getting something further out of town that's bigger.What I'm not sure about is how far I need to go.

If your house hasn't been updated in a long while (10 years plus) but isn't a wreck, I've found that's when work adds the most value. Doing a light cosmetic update to kitchens, bathrooms, flooring and a lick of paint can add a lot of value of done fairly neutrally and taking into account what current buyers for a property your size are looking for.


If the place is a wreck (not saying yours is!) it will only ever appeal to someone looking for a project and is likely to be gutted and so anything you do around the edges is likely wasted money.


Structural work done cheaply is off putting so if you can't do something properly its best to sell your house as is. Unless your kitchen already needs replacing, you will probably at best break even on doing a side return extension. Loft conversions do add money, but if you could convert your loft, you probably wouldn't need to move for more space.

My other half is an estate agent. He says there is no point in putting in a new kitchen/bathroom etc. as most buyers will rip out what you have put in and your money will be wasted. keep it clean, tidy and uncluttered and spend your dosh on your new place.

That's not really true. Of the many people that I know who have bought homes in London, almost all would only look for a place that doesn't require any work. Most people hate doing work and most don't have the extra cash to do anything significant to a place right after buying it with prices what they are.


Some buyers are looking to put their own stamp on a place (my partner and I are like that), and like most people looking to put a stamp on a place, prefer places that need work anyway that are cheaper so you aren't paying a premium for a house with a new kitchen that you plan to rip out.

Once your house is worth more than 600k, then definitely. Even if you buy a place worth exactly the same (just bigger and further out) as you current place, the stamp duty, legal fees and agent fees will be in excess of 30k.


If you are looking to spend more than what your place is worth, then you have to find the extra deposit or take on a bigger mortgage on top of the 30k+ for moving costs. That's why there are so many cranes in the sky doing loft conversions at the moment! Creating space is often a good alternative to moving and add values if you do eventual move on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...