Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Terrible crime and all that, but laughed my tits off at the posts!


I remember being a little tw@t of a teenager, in a gang of other little tw@ts of teenagers destroying other people's stuff for a laugh after a night on acid or after doing loads of hot knives, or draught sherry. That was quite a long time ago, so methinks this is not a new phenomenon.

Hey I did all sorts of drugs and dumb sht as a teenager but in the town I grew up in if you had gone around vandalising stuff you would have got a sound kicking from your neighbors who would then have taken you to the cops who would have given you anther kicking and then called your folks who would have taken you home and given another just for good measure.


It was all very civilized.

"Lower your carbon footprint and ditch the motor and you can lower car crime at the same time."


Is this an indication of empathy with the perpetrators?


As for a reduction in car ownership reducing crime, mindless vandalism of property was around long before the internal combustion engine.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but it's a bit rich to say if you live in London you don't need a car.


I don't know, unless you do have a job like Brendan's other half where you have to get from A to B very quickly, I'm not so sure anyone does.


I have an "essential car users" job, but don't drive and manage fine on buses and trains. I know kids on buses can be a pain, and isn't ideal, but you still can't say you need a car because you have kids, it just makes life easier.

In my job I have to carry a lot of gear around in and around London. Hiring transport, presumably not petrol driven but perhaps a small caravan of Rickshaws just wouldn't be practical or keep me competitive. I could of course change profession, take up a position locally (receptionist at Willis B?) and walk to work each day.

This seems to be happening every few weeks, in the same places, to the same car owners. For many years, we've had the same problem and I wouldn't be surprised if the same idiots are the culprits. As I walked down Friern Road, I noticed

three of the cars that had been broken in to, are all Peugeot 206's?

Not everyone needs a car, but there are plenty of people who regularly have to transport large/heavy items, or make regular journeys which would be very inconvenient by public transport. I fall into both of those categories, and that's enough to justify it to myself, anyway!

To be honest even if we didn?t need one I would still own a car (although it would probably be 30 years old and broken most of the time). Driving is one of my greatest pleasures. I fcking hate driving in London though. It is bad for my blood pressure.


The 37 does smell of poo. So do the carriages on South Eastern trains.

The 185 smells like vomit on a regualr basis.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My car lives on friern road.

>

> I'm not very happy about this at all. If I contact

> the police do you think they will do anything at

> all?

>

> I know they say they are aware of it but are they

> doing anything?


My neighbour told me, the police would make contact within 72 hours. But not to touch the car?

I live in London but work all over the country.

Sometime i get public transport where possible but couldn't do my job without a car.

And before you say it, i'm not only transporting myself but also kit and tools, sometimes too much to carry.

There, justified mine too...

(I am going for a bike license soon though so i am trying to reduce congestion and emissions etc...!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...