Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When we had a burst water main a few years ago and the area around CP road had no mains supply for about 3 days, we got chatting to the engineers coming to measure the head of pressure at intervals. He said that the increase in properties that are either being built or turned into flats and require their own mains supply meant that the pumping pressure has to be increased. What with the area being hilly as well-this just added to the pumping pressure problem. The underground pipes- some will be the old Victorian ones I daresay- then give way.

They are replacing the pipes but it is a slow job and by the time it is finished hopefully it will not be obsolete.

Anyway I am now firmly convinced that every problem of infrastructure and front line services, in London especially, is down to overpopulation and that the situation is going to deteriorate and our quality of life is going to suffer.

Every year we have to pay the EU a fine because we have not fulfilled its unrealistic air pollution standards- mainly due to population and car numbers increasing.

The situation is deplorable and is all a result of politicians chasing votes and short-sighted planning (due to the 5 year election cycle.

A builder on a phone in programme today was saying that he works with a lot of East Europeans who rent 3 bedroom houses and then 15 of them will live in it!

> He said that the increase in properties that are either being built or turned into flats and require their own mains supply meant that the pumping pressure has to be increased.


I have been told this too.


It's Southwark Council's fault for granting planning permission for family houses to be converted into flats.


John K

"A builder on a phone in programme today"


let's not question that source then...


15 people living in a three bedroom house will put a lot less pressure on infrastructure than 15 people living in a converted house with say, 6 flats


Not sure what your point is uncleglen


The general one about victorian pipes, modern living expectations and water pressure remains valid ? not sure what bringing foreigners into it does tho?

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's Southwark Council's fault for granting

> planning permission for family houses to be

> converted into flats.

>


Not seeking to antagonise... is there any evidence for this (e.g. that a 3-bed Victorian house in ED converted into two flats resulted in more people living there, on average)? I'd be interested to learn more - I had always convinced myself, probably ignorantly, that this wasn't the case, and that houses were (typically) populated by families and flats by singletons or couples. I know that there are no hard-and-fast rules, and that some singletons live in large houses and some large families live in flats, but has there been any research on the habiting numbers before/after conversion?

Just to let you all know that I've liaised with our council flood engineers on site in Herne Hill and they are now liaising directly with the Thames Water engineers about this report in North Cross Road. The TW Reference number is 1011226325.


We're told that TW are aware of this report and will definitely be sending a team down to investigate... let me know what happens!

More people need more heat, hot water, produce more waste, park more cars and wash more clothes. The water supply is a system, the more you take out the more you need to put in. The more you put in the more stress on the infrastructure at all points (entry, exit, process etc).


Bad planning, greed and poor governance are causing this. It's not just water but airports, rail networks, the electricity grid..... it goes on.


We need smart solutions and smart thinking not arguments, indifference, antiquation and shifting responsibility.

SJ - people who use a house just as a sleeping place will easily live 15 to a 3 bedroomed house- I saw it with my own eyes in East London and the Midlands in the 1970s. A relative is an estate agent in East London and couples rent a house, and after a few months turn up to buy a property as they have all been working and raise the deposit quickly.

Population density is much less now (per tenement) than it was in Victorian times (when much of the infrastructure, in particular water supply and waste) was initially being installed - read any contemporary accounts to see just how many people lived to a room in much of the City and East End (and in the West End around Drury Lane and St Giles).


What has changed (as has been noted) is the expectations of individuals in their water usage (and the amount of waste water disposed of).


This absolutely isn't about migrant workers housed in hovels, it is about aspiring and middle-class expectations of what is a 'good' life.


A major problem London has is that it has been a 'modern' city far longer than most others, so it was built a long time ago. Most of the housing in ED is late Victorian or Edwardian, with a minority of houses (many filling 2nd World war bomb scars) being built post 1st, let alone 2nd War. So the underlying infrastructure is there to support people who didn't have washing mashines or dish washers, mutiple flush lavatories in their houses, power showers etc. etc.


No wonder at times it creaks a bit.

And many of us will have personally known Australians who sleep a dozen to a room as well - I know that people do "maximise" space in a house.


My question is - given that it's a more efficient use of resources than dividing same house into multiple flats for same number of people, what is your problem with that?

Just went past and the tarmac is beginning to bulge upwards. Looks like it's going to be Herne Hill all over again.


Somebody was on their mobile to Thames Water who were "waiting for a gang to arrive". So glad our water bills are going up by almost ?30 a year when this is the service they provide.

We went past again about 7.30pm.


Just the same as it was this morning, plus as East of Dulwich says the tarmac is bulging more than it was before.


Still no sign of any action or even investigation by Thames Water.


Absolute disgrace. What are their priorities, exactly?


Ooops edited for typo!

Some of us will have crashed 10-15 to a room on a very temporary basis when young and travelling around but when bringing up children it is hardly ideal.

A developer wanted to convert a house next to me into 3 rabbit hutches but eventually settled for 2 flats with 2 separate mains water supplies and the water has to be pumped at a certain pressure to each flat

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We went past again about 7.30pm.

>

> Just the same as it was this morning, plus as East

> of Dulwich says the tarmac is bulging more than it

> was before.

>

> Still no sign of any action or even investigation

> by Thames Water.

>

> Absolute disgrace. What are their priorities,

> exactly?

>

> Ooops edited for typo!


They were there at 23.00 last night....


One has to think about the Technical implications of the operation.


To Repair the Main the water would need to be turned off.


If this is done whilst there is demand for water, people would drain their domestic supply dry.

Their tanks would run empty and their pipes would be air locked. Their Boilers could be damaged if hot water is drawn

off and may need bleeding afterwards.


If the leak is not too serious and NOT in a 3 foot main, then waiting until demand is low will

prevent all of those problems.



Foxy

Thanks for confirmation... I just got an email this morning informing me that Thames had attended yesterday and repaired a leak to the 4" domestic supply main. But I was a bit concerned to see the posts here as late as 9.20pm saying that it was still leaking, so it's useful to know that Thames were indeed seen on site at 11pm.


Let me know if anything else happens, our council engineers are on the case liaising closely with Thames.

  • 2 weeks later...
Unfortunately Thames water are slow to respond with this type of complaint. I work in a local ( ish ) health centre and the same happened. They failed to respond to the road that lifted up and cracked and the calls we made. It was only when the electrics in the health centre started failing and eventually the fire brigade were called who declared the centre unsafe and closed the road did they attend

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...