Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm posting this from France. I have spent a week in the Dordogne sampling the delights of the local cuisine, none finer than three lobe foie gras. I was slightly concerned at the potential cruelty aspect of this dish but having today been to a foie gras farm, I can confirm that the geese willingly waddle up to their feeder and seem at least to enjoy the experience. I've convinced myself it is as ethical as any meat product can be. My query is whether anyone can confirm a good Dulwich supplier of this delicious product, or do I need to risk a fee on my baggage allowance cramming packets in to the spare corners of my suitcase?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35790-foie-gras/
Share on other sites

I would love to believe the geese were contented, as you say. I adore Foie Gras! I had a wonderful dish of it at The Palmerston once and felt riddled with guilt for a week! Maybe the geese do only feel a bit full, rather than in pain. I suppose they wouldn't waddle up to the feeder if they were suffering. Oh God. Now I'm in a gandery (quandary - geddit?).
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35790-foie-gras/#findComment-674312
Share on other sites

Merely a thought, but anyone who objects to any aspect of foie gras, goose liver pate or any old else, before you willingly waddle up to the feeder perhaps, well just don't.

Equally if you're a fan of live goose force fed liver-smashing to provide a toothsome starter, then that's I suppose your 'bag' but consider before you willingly waddle up to the feeder, maybe.


Just attempting to stifle a donnybrook, is all.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35790-foie-gras/#findComment-674317
Share on other sites

Foie gras can either be produced using natural or forced feeding methods - if you are worried about the ethics, it may be wise to try to see which of these two methods the foie gras named in the outlets above falls into. I have seen pictures of forced feeding methods and it is absolutely monstrous - it lingers in the mind. There is some controversy around natural feeding methods too (it still enlarges the liver, which can lead the animal to feeling very sick in the days up to to its slaughter), so every individual has to make the decision on what they feel comfortable about eating.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35790-foie-gras/#findComment-674412
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What Firkins were they? The only localish ones I remember were the Phoenix and Firkin and the Fox and Firkin. The Plough has changed its name several times, and then back to the Plough, but to the best of my recollection the Uplands Tavern was named that until it became The Actress, and The Bishop was called something else whose name escapes me (though the smell from the gents lingers in my memory) but I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Firkin?
    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...