Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rahrahrah wrote: 'So they?re looking for property in ED. What?s the betting that Kirsty and Phil have them looking at properties in Nunhead, Sydenham and Norwood, before finally finding out that they ended up in Beckenham one year later.'


...or Penge.

I'm watching. Jesus Christ. Anyone got a towel to wipe the damp patches away from behind those foolish young ears? How can anyone seriously look at a below average property you have to pay a ridiculous price for in an average area. Oh well, takes all sorts of people to keep the world spinning.


Louisa.

Where exactly do you suggest they live for one of these above average London properties for "reasonable prices" in an average area? They are hardly naive just because London is expensive...



Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm watching. Jesus Christ. Anyone got a towel to

> wipe the damp patches away from behind those

> foolish young ears? How can anyone seriously look

> at a below average property you have to pay a

> ridiculous price for in an average area. Oh well,

> takes all sorts of people to keep the world

> spinning.

>

> Louisa.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where exactly do you suggest they live for one of

> these above average London properties for

> "reasonable prices" in an average area? They are

> hardly naive just because London is expensive...

>

>


I suggest they stay in the suburbs and commute in, which is what they're doing anyway. Rather than jumping the Home Counties trendy bandwagon into zone 2/3 and super inflating inner London prices and forcing existing locals with family roots to be priced out of buying where they grew up! Just saying.


Louisa.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That makes no sense, but you already know that.

> You say they are naive to buy where they want to

> live because other people want to live there too

> (who you deem more deserving)?


What I'm saying is you don't have to live somewhere just because you like it, especially if it means paying through the nose for it and forcing existing locals out of the market. Example - I love Mayfair, it is amazing. Brilliant place to visit and maybe even work in (just a guess no experience). I know I can't afford to live there, unless I want to invest in a dustbin minus the lid, which I'm not keen on doing. Therefore, I visit the area, but know it would be ridiculous to consider buying there on my budget. The same applies to the Home Counties trendies, they love the edgy vibe of inner London and possibly want to work and socialise there. Well, why not stay in the Home Counties, do all that stuff you love to do in London, and buy a cheaper property which is larger in the area you grew up. It stops this hyper inflation property bubble in London and means that people who grew up around here have half a chance at being able to buy in the area where they have their roots.


Louisa.

The Mayfair example doesn't match up because these buyers can afford to move some place they like better than where they are now. People using their money to live where they like isn't surprising or unreasonable (or even a new phenomena as its been happening for centuries). What you suggest is being tied to the area you were born in like in feudal times.

That's subjective LondonMix. I personally wouldn't describe the particular locations as any better than where they came from. The reasons for these people moving are of course varied, but overwhelmingly they want to live near where they work or WANT to work. And they want to live near a trendy inner city vibe. You can't force people not to buy somewhere else, but people moving en mass into areas has caused and continues to cause friction. Whole villages in Cornwall are left abandoned out of the year by second home invaders who destroy local communities. The post war migration (much of it forced) OUT of bombed slums of inner-London to new towns in Essex, Hertfordshire et al caused friction and cultural disenfranchisement with the newly inhabited communities. Much the same is now happening in zone 2/3 London. Local people are simply unable to buy because prices are rising ridiculously above the national average and cash rich buyers are swomping the market from outside. You only need to look at 'Prime London' where whole blocks of flats and houses are bought by foreign investors and left empty for years.


Louisa.

I didn't say better, I said a place they "like better" which is self-evident and could be for any reason.


Its sad, for whatever reason, when people can't live where they would like to (because its been destroyed by bombs or because its become too expensive). Its also sad when a once thriving area dies because its population abandons it for better opportunities. Its also unfortunate when people are hostile to "new people" moving into an area.


Movement and change are part of life and there is good and bad that goes along with that. Saying these kids should stay where they come from or saying they are naive is just silly though.

Whether or not you think prices in East Dulwich/Forest Hill are too high, if you watched the programme, they wanted to move as they were spending 4 hours/day commuting and had no time for socialising with their friends or spending any time together as a couple. Staying where they were didn't seem to be an option.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/information-hub/assistance-dogs-emotional-support-dogs-and-therapy-dogs/   hello   i’d be interested to understand if anyone.has experience of Assistance Dogs especially for autistic children of different ages for emotional support and therapy   There was a prior thread on this topic on EDF 10 hrs ago but it had limited experiences and there was a (claimed) change in UK legislation in 2019. Whilst the industry appears unregulated/unlicensed, there are several providers (approx 15, perhaps more) who claim to have fully trained dogs or say that they can help families to train a puppy/young dog over the 18-24 months.  The latter obviously comes with a need for strong commitment to the challenge. Costs for a fully trained assistance dog are quoted at £13-15k albeit they claim £23k total cost to train the dog. On the one hand, this could potentially be a useful solution for some families if such a dog was truly trained as their websites claim and such a dog was accepted in public places and schools etc… On the other hand, I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an assistance dog of this type or in this context (only for a blind or partially sighted person) and hence a real risk of fraud or exploitation! The SEN challenge for families coupled with limited resources in schools or from local authorities or the NHS as well as the extremely challenging experience of many families with schools offering little or no support or making the situation worse leaves a big risk of lots of different types of fraud and or exploitation in this area.          
    • Hi there  We live on Woodwarde Road backing on to Alleyns Top Field.  Our cat Gigi has gone missing — it’s been about 24 hours now. She is a cream Bengal. Could you please check sheds, garages, or anywhere she might have got stuck please? And if you could keep an eye out or share on any local groups/forums, we’d really appreciate it. Photo attached.   Thanks so much! My name is Jeff on 07956 910068. 
    • Colin.    One for the old school.   Just saying.
    • Signed, and I will share it elsewhere, thank you for posting this. It's got nearly 70,000 signatures at present, and apparently runs till February.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...