Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And it's opening in September 2008, I kid you not. Like Alleyns, it will cater for 4-18 year olds, it's a short walk from East Dulwich station and Lordship Lane, and in a beautiful, imposing building. With secondary fees of ?7,000 per year it's not cheap, but it's a lot cheaper than Alleyns. Unlike the Harris Academy, it won't be crammed with 900 boys. And its meals will be organic, too!


Is there a catch? I fear there might be. It's called the New Hope Christian school, opening in the building on the corner of Matham Grove and East Dulwich Grove, and taking over from the Seventh Day Adventist school that used to operate there. I know this because there's an A4 sheet about it stuck crudely over the old Adventist signs.


Quite how such a small building will accommodate the full age range from 4-18 is not clear. Pupils will leave school with the 'International Certificate of Christian Education'. And the website doesn't make clear how their biology lessons will tackle evolution.


But hey, it adds to the mix I suppose.


Did anyone ever have any contact with its predecessor? I can't remember ever seeing any children in that building, but I suppose I don't tend to go past during school hours.

I think I've spotted the catch(es): it's a christian school (atheists and other world religions need not apply I assume); it offers a generally unrecognised certificate rather than A'Levels or baccalaureate and it costs 7K per year per child


that'll be 3, did I miss any?


:)


edited to say I've found their website: here

I assume it's East Dulwich Grove and not East Dulwich Road.


Personally I don't like faith schools because they exclude children because of their parent's faith etc etc and I would rather they don't spread their exclusive and false preachings to vulnerable youngsters round these parts.

Is this a joke? That's the very last thing East Dulwich needs, a school run by crackpot Bible bashers. And if the fees are 7k a year in London the quality of education will be bargain basement as well as fundamentalist.


I think faith schools are evil. We don't have schools for different races or cultures so why is religion a justifiable means of social apartheid?

from the shool's website:

"Social studies curriculum looks at world history and cultures from the perspective that God is the Designer, Creator, and Controller of the universe. As a result, to study social studies is to study responses of people to the truth of the Word of God. Beginning in the Garden of Eden, man?s failure to abide by the principles of God is traced throughout history."


How can it be right to teach children that these days?

Good grief, who allows these morons a teaching license. A biology teacher proclaiming creationism!?! They should be ashamed.


I fear, however, there is little we can do. And what's worse, if they begin to get good league table placings expect parents to be converting quick smart.

What I really object to is the brainwashing aspect. How can it be legal to teach a load of old stories as established fact to young kids? We don't have schools that teach history and morality through the lens of Grimm's Fairy Tales or Greek Myths so why should Christianity be any different?


No wonder society seems fragmented when there are places like this opening all over the place...

Exactly right Bawdy-nan. I do believe in kids making their own choices, but I don't disagree with faith schools.


However, this one looks a bit mental. I saw a programme about an academy up in Middlesborough or there abouts, where they taught the biblical creation story as part of the history curriculem, and then told them, "however, you'll need to write this in your GCSE papers, it's not true, but it's what the unbelievers want to hear".

The point is that faith schools should not teach creationism or intelligent design as accepted science or fact. When it is neither.


It is clearly a religious view and should be kept as such. The curriculum should reflect this.


These lot used to teach the earth was flat and it was heresy to think anything else. You wouldn't want that taught in schools and the principle is exactly the same.


Evolution is one of the most widely supported and accepted theorys in the scientific community. It is supported by masses of evidence and peer group reviews.

Nothing of the like can be said for ID or creationism.Both are unfalsifiable, which means they should not be taught as science.


Rant over.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I fear, however, there is little we can do. And

> what's worse, if they begin to get good league

> table placings expect parents to be converting

> quick smart.



There was a conversation about this on here a good while back. I hate when people will pretend to follow a religion, that they'd otherwise laugh about, for a few weeks to get a school place!

demery Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The point is that faith schools should not teach

> creationism or intelligent design as accepted

> science or fact. When it is neither.

>

> It is clearly a religious view and should be kept

> as such. The curriculum should reflect this.

>

> These lot used to teach the earth was flat and it

> was heresy to think anything else. You wouldn't

> want that taught in schools and the principle is

> exactly the same.

>

> Evolution is one of the most widely supported and

> accepted theorys in the scientific community. It

> is supported by masses of evidence and peer group

> reviews.

> Nothing of the like can be said for ID or

> creationism.Both are unfalsifiable, which means

> they should not be taught as science.

>

> Rant over.



I don't think anyone on here would argue with any of that whether they are for against or against faith schools as a whole. I went to a faith school, but I certainly didn't leave thinking that God had thrown the earth together on a whim because he had an opening in his diary one week.

Totally agree. I think it's quite shameful that schools are allowed to peddle this Medieval nonsense while the unfortunate few gay kids who are sent to them have to keep their sexuality a secret. Heard recently about a girl at one such school who confided to a sports teacher that she thought she might be a lesbian. She was made to sit outside the changing rooms while the other girls showered.


What vile hypocrisy.

Jamma Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely this school won't be appearing on any

> league tables if it's not teaching GCSEs etc.

> Isn't there some sort of law that says kids have

> to sit GCSEs? What sort of job can you apply for

> with a 'I'm a Good Christian' certificate?


Theologian? Vicar? Tom Cruise's assistant?

How is the issue of sexuality any different from this particular school to "normal" schools?


James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally agree. I think it's quite shameful that

> schools are allowed to peddle this Medieval

> nonsense while the unfortunate few gay kids who

> are sent to them have to keep their sexuality a

> secret. Heard recently about a girl at one such

> school who confided to a sports teacher that she

> thought she might be a lesbian. She was made to

> sit outside the changing rooms while the other

> girls showered.

>

> What vile hypocrisy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    • Now who might that be?
    • Harvey and Wheeler in Dulwich Village? Only one I know… How can they offer to apply and never did? Surely; whether they are managing the property or not and with tech been so advanced I would have thought they would have been a couple of e mails sent as a reminder or, is it the Landlord’s responsibility to apply… Rental Law/ Bill has just come  into force  - can’t remember if it was this week or last and have been to busy to read.. However, will as assume it is not individual councils but all councils. Came up on Which on line.. Good point Jen Jen Jen - sure some knowledgable person on here can throw more light than I.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...