Jump to content

Recommended Posts

londoner_77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why would anyone want to claim they live in

> > Peckham when they don't? I went to Peckham

> Manor

> > school in the late 60's and early 70's, Peckham

> > was nasty then and it still is. But then East

> > Dulwich was crap then and it ain't much better

> > now.

>

> That's quite a negative post! There are some very

> nice bits of Peckham - and East Dulwich is lovely!


Negative but true, Peckham was/is nasty and is East Dulwich is far from "lovely". I also owned a shop in Peckham for 7 years which simply reinforced my belief the place was a hole.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.southwark.anglican.org/parishes/dulwich



What's your point?


"Dulwich Deanery

Rev Canon Charles Richardson

The parishes of this small Deanery, stretching from South Peckham to beyond Dulwich Village

Even if at one time, East Dulwich stretched in to what is now Peckham, boundaries change. You are the only person in 2013 that uses CofE Parishes to define borders.


SE15 is Peckham. Everyone except for you basically gets that. You shouldn't be ashamed John, embrace your Peckham roots!

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> londoner_77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Why would anyone want to claim they live in

> > > Peckham when they don't? I went to Peckham

> > Manor

> > > school in the late 60's and early 70's,

> Peckham

> > > was nasty then and it still is. But then East

> > > Dulwich was crap then and it ain't much

> better

> > > now.

> >

> > That's quite a negative post! There are some

> very

> > nice bits of Peckham - and East Dulwich is

> lovely!

>

> Negative but true, Peckham was/is nasty and is

> East Dulwich is far from "lovely". I also owned a

> shop in Peckham for 7 years which simply

> reinforced my belief the place was a hole.




Parkdrive, do you really think so? I honestly think East Dulwich is lovely! Out of interest, why do you think otherwise? And don't you think there are some nice bits of Peckham? What were your experiences of owning a shop there?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> SE15 is Peckham. Everyone except for you basically

> gets that. You shouldn't be ashamed John, embrace

> your Peckham roots!



Ah so edhistory lives in SE15? Honestly, the lengths some people will go to in order to claim they live in East Dulwich, heehee!

Peckham- the dream is over


gegen hipsters


tonight I saw the first tranch of crusty dreadlock lite itlian squat fashionista easy jet weekenders in swinging london arrive at Rye station.


tonights agenda is Peckham. Tomorrow , Camden lock and carnaby street, Sunday, Brick lane street drinking then a flight home armed with bags of nasty banksy laminates and shoddy chinese made Rasta ashtrays.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for your reply. I have sent you a PM.  
    • It required legislation to identify the beneficial owners of properties in the UK held by overseas companies - and these still haven't been properly disclosed - ownership of things isn't just a google search away - and to suggest otherwise is not to understand how capitalism works. Unless you (cyclemonkey) do have access to that knowledge and would like to share.
    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...