Jump to content

Recommended Posts

londoner_77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why would anyone want to claim they live in

> > Peckham when they don't? I went to Peckham

> Manor

> > school in the late 60's and early 70's, Peckham

> > was nasty then and it still is. But then East

> > Dulwich was crap then and it ain't much better

> > now.

>

> That's quite a negative post! There are some very

> nice bits of Peckham - and East Dulwich is lovely!


Negative but true, Peckham was/is nasty and is East Dulwich is far from "lovely". I also owned a shop in Peckham for 7 years which simply reinforced my belief the place was a hole.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.southwark.anglican.org/parishes/dulwich



What's your point?


"Dulwich Deanery

Rev Canon Charles Richardson

The parishes of this small Deanery, stretching from South Peckham to beyond Dulwich Village

Even if at one time, East Dulwich stretched in to what is now Peckham, boundaries change. You are the only person in 2013 that uses CofE Parishes to define borders.


SE15 is Peckham. Everyone except for you basically gets that. You shouldn't be ashamed John, embrace your Peckham roots!

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> londoner_77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Why would anyone want to claim they live in

> > > Peckham when they don't? I went to Peckham

> > Manor

> > > school in the late 60's and early 70's,

> Peckham

> > > was nasty then and it still is. But then East

> > > Dulwich was crap then and it ain't much

> better

> > > now.

> >

> > That's quite a negative post! There are some

> very

> > nice bits of Peckham - and East Dulwich is

> lovely!

>

> Negative but true, Peckham was/is nasty and is

> East Dulwich is far from "lovely". I also owned a

> shop in Peckham for 7 years which simply

> reinforced my belief the place was a hole.




Parkdrive, do you really think so? I honestly think East Dulwich is lovely! Out of interest, why do you think otherwise? And don't you think there are some nice bits of Peckham? What were your experiences of owning a shop there?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> SE15 is Peckham. Everyone except for you basically

> gets that. You shouldn't be ashamed John, embrace

> your Peckham roots!



Ah so edhistory lives in SE15? Honestly, the lengths some people will go to in order to claim they live in East Dulwich, heehee!

Peckham- the dream is over


gegen hipsters


tonight I saw the first tranch of crusty dreadlock lite itlian squat fashionista easy jet weekenders in swinging london arrive at Rye station.


tonights agenda is Peckham. Tomorrow , Camden lock and carnaby street, Sunday, Brick lane street drinking then a flight home armed with bags of nasty banksy laminates and shoddy chinese made Rasta ashtrays.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...