Jump to content

Trying to buy a house in this area is near impossible


Grotty

Recommended Posts

strae Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just had to the call to say I've completed on

> our

> > flat in Penge. So I am now the proud owner of a

> > whopping 7% of a property. And whilst it may

> not

> > be the home I always dreamt of buying (actually

> > I've never really dreamt about buying a home),

> I

> > do feel very fortunate to be in this position.

> >

> > And I'm a 10 minute walk from McDonald's! ;-)

>

> I look forward to the inevitable article touting

> Penge as the new hot spot!

> Shortly followed by the also likely inevitable

> post about on these forums about how Penge is just

> not quite what it was!

>

> Jokes aside, congratulations and well done!



Penge had a mention in the Standard about 4 weeks ago.


Otta congrats and check out Virtual Norwood Local news forum website - there's a lot going on in Penge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of back on topic, and on the subject of Inner London vs Outer London, I saw this on the BBC website:


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/uk_house_prices/counties/html/county39.stm


and was surprised at (i) how expensive Southwark is and (ii) how stark the difference between inner and outer boroughs is. Basically, the whole of the southern and eastern/north eastern suburbs are massively cheaper than almost anywhere in inner London.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hickory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seriously. This.

> http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/prope

> rty-29180898.html


xxxxxx


A quite small three bed terrace in Ulverscroft Road which until very recently was two flats owned by a housing association was thoroughly ripped out and poncified recently and put on the market for ?825k. Yes, that's ?825k.


It's been sold, but I have no idea whether the developers got their asking price.




"Previously listed for sale on 19th Jan 2014 for ?825,000


3 bedroom terraced house


Property history of 30 Ulverscroft Road, London SE22 9HG


Vincent Chandler is delighted to offer to the market this three bedroomed and highly attractive house in the heart of East Dulwich. Having recently been refurbished to an extremely high standard, this Victorian property has a pleasant blend of ... blah blah blah."


http://www.zoopla.co.uk/property/30-ulverscroft-road/london/se22-9hg/21181449


ETA: Oh, and they ripped out all the garden and plants and put in some hard landscaping stuff.


That'll be good for wildlife and prevention of flooding then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crissy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> strae Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Just had to the call to say I've completed on

> > our

> > > flat in Penge. So I am now the proud owner of

> a

> > > whopping 7% of a property. And whilst it may

> > not

> > > be the home I always dreamt of buying

> (actually

> > > I've never really dreamt about buying a

> home),

> > I

> > > do feel very fortunate to be in this

> position.

> > >

> > > And I'm a 10 minute walk from McDonald's! ;-)

> >

> > I look forward to the inevitable article

> touting

> > Penge as the new hot spot!

> > Shortly followed by the also likely inevitable

> > post about on these forums about how Penge is

> just

> > not quite what it was!

> >

> > Jokes aside, congratulations and well done!

>

>

> Penge had a mention in the Standard about 4 weeks

> ago.

>

> Otta congrats and check out Virtual Norwood Local

> news forum website - there's a lot going on in

> Penge



Virtual Norwood is a bit quiet these days. Crystal Palace Life forum is a better bet - it covers Penge too http://crystalpalacelife.com/index.php/kunena/index

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GinaG3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We cant even do that. I've checked everything.

> Based on income we could only get a loan of 42,000

> maximum. That would mean buying at 62,000 or part

> buying, even then its more than we can afford with

> shared ownership.



I wouldn't recommend shared-ownership - it's a con. The only people who benefit are the Housing Associations. Someone told me that before I bought my shared-ownership 20 years ago and I didn't listen but they were right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My gosh that Bellenden Road house is ridiculously priced - it's currently uninhabitable. I would imagine the market would be serious property investors who will drive a hard bargain with the owners.


BB100 i disagree about Shared Ownership, i just think it has been poorly marketed. I have had friends who have used it as a means to get somewhere. Those who have been most happy are those who have seen it as a way to get long term security of tenure - eg regard it almost as council housing. It will not help you "get on the property ladder" in any real sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We were trying to contact Steve on 07990904375, following this post and yet there wasn't any reply from this number. Is it a correct number to contact Steve for decoration work?  
    • You might be 'amused' but obviously its something thats enough of a concern that there are specific rules in the entrance criteria to specifically disallow this, so not exactly comparative.  Aside from the flawed analysis, the idea of so much movement that there is a massive cost to the taxpayer of finding extra schooling is also unlikely.  As I noted upthread, the cost of private school education has increased dramatically in recent years.  Increases in fees over 10% per annum in some cases, so the idea that the application of VAT would drive the majority out just isn't the case.  There will be some who can't afford it any more. But then there are lots of people who couldn't afford it in the first place. Anyone who has accepted a school place in the last 2-3 years will have known this was Labour's policy, so their kids will be in year 9 by the time Labour gets in.  That would mean that only parents of those with children in years 10/11 likely to have been unaware when signing up.  They can obviously move their children for sixth form if needed.  The others shouldn't be surprised!  Those with children in juniors will need to take a view whether affordable or move to the state sector. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...