Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do love them, but not at those prices.

Good luck to them I say, Jones' comment made me chuckle and it wouldn't surprise me if it was true.

I doubt any of them are especially minted from their endeavours.


Apart from Palin and all those travel books....

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I doubt any of them are especially minted from

> their endeavours.

>

> Apart from Palin and all those travel books....


Idle and Gilliam must be loaded, surely? Things not going so well for John Cleese recently though, by all accounts....

My issue with it is that I just don't think they're funny any more. Well past their sell-by date. Plus, the O2 is not a venue for comedy IMO. All 5 nights are showing as sold out but they aren't as lots of blocks are being held back. So if anyone actually does want to go to it then wait a while until tickets are re-released, which will happen.
John Cleese spends about a gazillion a year on pyschoanlysis and paying off his various wives - it seems a viscous circle with the pysconalaysis not helping in his choice of partner which pushes him into more analysis. Terry Jones used to drink in the Firkin & Pheonix a lot, he probably had a big tab to settle.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Terry Jones did say he hoped they'd make a lot of

> money so he could pay off his mortgage. Maybe he

> wasn't actually joking.

>

> Still, it'll probably be more fun than a Rolling

> Stones concert, and it's cheap next to some of

> their tickets!


Says a man who has never seen the Stones live. Pah!


Seen Terry Jones in many pubs around the manor over the years. Lovely bloke by all accounts. He's owned a house nearby since 1969.


Cleese must be skint. All that alimony and wasting money on shrinks. Fuck that.


The o2 is horrible and not the place I would want to see anybody.

The O2 is just about OK for a loud evening of rock but definitely not for comedy. Demand was high for the Pythons so I guess if they'd have played a smaller venue then they wouldn't be able to shoe-horn as many people in. Some crazy prices on the secondary market for the Pythons right now. Personally I think the RAH would have been iconic.
It is a Dead Bargain , It has exceeded, it has broken the bank, It has gone to the Golder Tower, It has joined LeeMan Brothers, It is a Royal Bank of Scotland. It has Nothern Rocked its socks off. It has gone down the Yellow Brick Road,It has joined the Bullingden Club, Kt has Spun the Zero .

Agree with posts of many of the above. Not funny anymore. John Cleese lost it for me when he advertised Sainsbury's in his Bond character, and Terry Jones's admission is basically like saying he wants to rip us all off.

On the news it said all the tickets were sold in 43 seconds. A bit like The Book of Mormon, there are too many rip-off shows around. Best to catch shows when they're on early try out at Menier, BAC, etc.


And LIKE the above post!

Johnny Rotten made a similar admission about a Sex Pistols reunion. It's just honest.


We'll get together and give you what you want to see, and we'll make money for it.


Don't think there's anything wrong in that, and they will probably have had very little, if anything to do with setting the prices.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry to hear you are having issues. Fwiw, we received a regular letter this week. Maybe it's worth asking at the Dulwich delivery office (it's in West Dulwich, though. Their phone number is 03457740740) to see if there are aware of any issues in your particular area?  I've seen cases in the past were the a particular postie was sick and they didn't cover for them, they just let everything accumulate for a couple of days until the person was back.
    • Mal, it is related to this issue and if you scroll back a few pages you will see that Brockwell was brought up in relation to this (not by me I hasten to add). Do you not think it seems perfectly reasonable for people to be able to reference a neighbouring event - one that is having a number of challenges not too dissimilar to the ones Gala is having?     These sentences from the BrixtonBuzz article I linked seem very pertinent too:  The concern, they argue, is not just about permits, but about the Council’s repeated failure to follow proper planning processes and its habit of acting in the interests of commercial promoters rather than the local community.   And this: The group is now calling on residents to write to their local MP and councillors, accusing the Council of using legal mechanisms to avoid scrutiny.
    • Mal, like it or not, it does have some bearing on other councils. There was an item about it on Times Radio on Sunday - Kate Borsay, a presenter who lives locally, referenced Peckham Rye in relation to the Brockwell case. As the reporter pointed out, local councils will all be talking to each other and closely following how things unfold. If a precedent is set with Brockwell, other councils will be under greater scrutiny. 
    • Why don't you start a new thread about Brockwell Park?  I promise that I won't post on it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...