Jump to content

Recommendation for Blue Tit hair salon, Peckham Rye


eleanorjane

Recommended Posts

Another beautiful cut by Bradley at Blue Tit on Peckham Rye. I'm really pleased to have found this place, lovely service, good advice, everyone knows their stuff, you feel very safe in their hands. The interior is beautiful too. A glass of wine, and a nice chat with Bradley, all very relaxing. Everyone who leaves looks amazing. The products they use, and sell, are great too.



http://www.bluetitlondon.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Eleanor Jane and Alice for your kind words. We hold charity days every year in each of our Salons and this year all profits made at our Peckham salon will be donated to a local South London charity called Down's South which is a parent run charity supporting children with Down's Syndrome and their families. We are so pleased to hear you booked in today and part of the fundraising. Over the Christmas period we are also collecting any old toys that you no longer use that we will wrap up in the salon put under our Christmas Tree and give out to children in care at Christmas. Thank you again for all your support and Merry Christmas xx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but I have to say I find it quite normal to have different pricing for mens and womens cuts-I always expect to pay more as a woman.

I think its the norm and not sexist at all...I've been to local salons and West end famous name ones and I really don't have a problem with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Callie, we appreciate your message as we strive to be as fairness is our highest priority. There are a few reasons for the price difference; a lot more work goes into cutting girls hair such as more sectioning which require more trained skills. Girls also get a blow dry to finish which in itself is hard work and gents usually don't get. There are more products used on female hair, more shampoo and conditioner and more styling products used when drying and styling the hair. It generally takes longer for a girls cut and finish. I hope this helps. Thanks for your message.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Bluetitlondon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Callie, we appreciate your message as we strive

> to be as fairness is our highest priority. There

> are a few reasons for the price difference; a lot

> more work goes into cutting girls hair such as

> more sectioning which require more trained skills.

> Girls also get a blow dry to finish which in

> itself is hard work and gents usually don't get.

> There are more products used on female hair, more

> shampoo and conditioner and more styling products

> used when drying and styling the hair. It

> generally takes longer for a girls cut and finish.

> I hope this helps. Thanks for your message.


Not everyone 'girl' wants a blow dry, so do you have a price that reflects that? Most salons do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently went to Bluetit for the first time and I loved it. I usually get my hair cut in town but will be returning. There are plenty of hairdressers around and if you have objections to paying the prices in one there are lots of others that will happily take your cash .


We are lucky enough to live in an area with lots of choice - if you don't like whats on offer somewhere rather than expect them to change for your (single) view you ae bound to find somewhere that meets your needs. Then everyone is happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of hairdressers offer cuts without blow drys, inc Headnizm, or only a rough dry, which they don't charge for, so my view is not a single one, despite your statement. Blow drys on their own often cost ?25-?30 pounds so they would seem to make up the majority of the time needed for a hair appt. And, if you have short hair, it's very unlikely you would need a blow dry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No idea. Ask One Dulwich   No. There are two seperate issues. I believe some cover their plates deliberately (delivery drivers etc) and a number are confused by signage. I spend a lot of time in that area and have only ever seen one car drive through and it was an elderly couple who were incredibly confused (and subsequently very apologetic to an angry cyclist who was calling them all the names under the sun).   Some questions for you to answer now: 1) Which consultation are you referring to? 2) Did you agree with the council's insistence on keeping the junction closed to emergency vehicles despite the emergency services telling them it was delaying response times?   3) At a time of funding crisis do you think £1.5m is a good spend to redesign a junction and those redesigns: - potentially increase emergency vehicle response times - do nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders - do nothing to slow cyclists at a pedestrian area  
    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...