Jump to content

Nanny versus nursery - what are your thoughts???


Recommended Posts

I have a 4 yr old and 7 mth old. With my eldest I did a nanny share from ten mths until two when she went to nursery. I am doing the same with the baby. I think it is up to your individual feeling as I think no childcare solution (including parental!) is perfect but if you choose the right nanny/ childminder/ nursery the kids seem to adapt well to whichever you choose do long as they are getting lots of attention and affection.


For me personally, I felt that a nanny in a home setting was best before two as they don't really need to 'socialise' before then rather they need some consistent input from one or two carers. The bonus of a nanny share was that it made it more affordable (similar to nursery) was more flexible and my daughter benefitted from having the other baby around... They went on to nursery together and are now best friends/ 'married'! We became v good friends with the other parents too. I am hoping my nanny share for no 2 will be the same


Jude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine is in nursery since she was 1. Agree with above-there is no perfect solution. Also agree one to one before they are two is better. My daughter was also constantly ill from when she started nursery (but was rarely ill before)-this put me under enormous pressure with the time I needed to take off from work to care for her. On the other hand, mine learnt to eat from copying peers at nursery- she was a disaster before that so definitely a plus. Also, I'm not a trusting person so was more comfortable with a group of people watching my daughter as I thought this would reduce the risk of anyone being mean to her (I had had a bad experience with a babysitter I overheard treating my daughter in a mean way over the baby monitor in the next room). So, not much help but my best advice is do your homework, see the nurserys and interview nannies and childminders and go with your gut-you have to be comfortable with your choice. Good luck. X
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My son has been in a nursery since he was 1 and has thrived. I really do think it is down to the individual child though and you need to do what is right for their personality. My son is very active and much to my horror I felt he was quite bored with me by the end of my mat leave so with all the activities they do during the day he was in heaven when he went to nursery. I would say you need to find the right childcare whichever option you go for, I was lucky that I found a great nursery that really do love my son to pieces and have been excellent with dealing with his tantrums / food allergies etc. He had a fabulous keyworker for 12-20m who gave him lots of cuddles etc and really doted on him, he now has a different keyworker who is just as excellent but a male and they do loads of running around and activities together so different butn equally great. The power of peers I also thing is very strong like shaunag said so eating / going to the loo / development can be assisted by the power of peers. The first part when putting a child in to nursery can be difficult to juggle as they do pick up all types of bugs and we dont have any help in terms of family so it can be a juggle but he now at 2 is very rarely off nursery.


Good luck in what you decide. x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try ED nanny agency site and googling generally and you will also get some good tips and handy list of pros and cons. I used a childminder and that was ideal home from home but had I had more budget nanny would have been tempting. Am now going through similar dilemma with baby due in spring, prob going for live in nanny but daunting trying to decide as well as budgeting!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
It depends on different factors. I think the best solution for the child?s needs are nannys, but they can be very pricey. Nurseries are the cheapest options. But if you can?t afford a nanny, but still want something better for a small child then a childminder would be the best. That?s what I think for small children up to the age of 3. After the age of 3 I would always suggest a nursery.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I did nanny share until just under 2. Will do same for second. They don't get as ill as they do in nursery so less stressful for you re taking time off. Also far more flexible on hours and being eg 10 mins late. I also like the idea of them being in a home environment when tiny. Personal choice though - I have friends who went down the nursery rout and are very happy. Try simplychildcare.com. We for d our nanny on there and far cheaper than agencies. Good luck!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Neither of which are Dulwich private schools though. I also wasn't being entirely serious.
    • Greg has completed a variety of tasks for us including - door trimming, kitchen bench install, making shed doors and more. Always reliable, good quality work and a very fair price
    • Someone leaked the report to an "activist" journalist knowing full well they they would "selectively pluck" items to fit their agenda.....and remember large parts of the report were based on data from "activist researcher" Dr Aldred...   https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/08/low-traffic-neighbourhoods-generally-popular-report-ordered-by-sunak-finds   Very much a case of when the headline:   Rishi Sunak’s report finds low-traffic neighbourhoods work and are popular   ....doesn't get supported by your article:   A copy of the report seen by the Guardian said that polling carried out inside four sample LTNs for the DfT found that overall, twice as many local people supported them as opposed them.   A review of evidence of their effectiveness said that although formal studies were limited, they did not support the contention of opponents that LTNs simply displaced traffic to other streets rather than easing overall congestion. “The available evidence from the UK indicates that LTNs are effective in achieving outcomes of reducing traffic volumes within their zones while adverse impacts on boundary roads appear to be limited,” it read.   The problem is these articles then get reposted by "activist lobby groups" like of Clean Air Dulwich as "proof".....
    • Wood pigeons strut about in my garden as if they own the place.   It's amusing watching them try to work out how to access the bird feeder ports. They usually end up walking about underneath the feeders  hoping for bits to drop down 😂 This has  however wrecked the bed which my bird feeder pole is in, which now has virtually no plants in it, including some which I had had for decades 😭
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...