Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tony - It is probably beyond you to read properly into this subject, and to appreciate the worthlessness of terms such as "race" and "black" in relation to the phenomena of certain groups appearing to be better at certain events than other. It is difficult to enter into a conversation on this issue with someone who takes such a simplistic and frankly suspicious framework of analysis (see your ludicourus and frankly offensive schoolboy experiment). A few minutes will show you that this is (as a previous poster explained very cogently) a deeply complex area where the science is not at all settled. There is in fact a University Department dedicated to the study of East African endurance athletes (try Googling "Yannis Pitsiladis"); and the evidence emerging out of there about the complex relationship between athletic performance and genes, environment and culture demonstrate that your simplistic approach to this issue is utterly risible).

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony - It is probably beyond you ....

...... It is difficult to enter into a

> conversation on this issue with someone who takes

> such a simplistic and frankly suspicious framework

> of analysis (see your ludicourus and frankly

> offensive schoolboy experiment). ....

..... a deeply complex area......

....Which roughly translates(ignoring the ridiculously patronising tone) that you and your (now) invisible friend haven't got a scooby-doo(tu)

btw: Oh! DO explain..what is "offensive"about someone hypothetically (based on their knowledge and/or experience) or literally, doing a test to see if different Groups do have differences(in general-with exceptions) is it the possible potential results that are "beyond you " and your comprehension to realise that there might,just might,be differences between Groups of people???

Just a footnote:Isn't extraordinary that anyone who has a different view or opinion to the one I proferred has a total incapacity to express that view without a condescending,patronising or "oh! so superior" manner! I was naturally civil,pleasant and polite during all our communications.

What a shame that you were not able to do likewise.

Actually taper,as like the Prodigal Son,you have returneth allow me to "patronise" you,in return.

I'm going to try a revolutionary concept,foolish I know,but here goes....I'm going to ask you,directly, a straightforward,simple question that you can easily reply to which is NOT "beyond you"...

Do you think(as a Group) that Black people are better Dancers than White people?

"Do you think(as a Group) that Black people are better Dancers than White people?"


Sorry, remind me. were we making huge generalisations regards supposed 'groups' (thus far defined as blacks and whites). Or are we saying that those supposed groups can produce representatives among the top 3 performers at [enter activity here] more often the other group?


Just for clarification you understand.


I personally think that Spaniards are infinitely better dancers than the English, until such time as you put any house music on, at which point they seemingly lose all sense of rhythm entirely. Don't know where that all fits in though.

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tricky one Tony: my view, there is no

> relationshsip between skin pigmentation and

> dancing ability. Self-parody as high art!

> (td)(td)(tu)

....So do you think Black British People of Caribbean origin have more "natural" rhythm than White Brits?(as a Group with exceptions either way?)...

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I challenge any limbo dancing champion of your

> declared group to try Morris dancing versus fat

> beardie blokes in Suffolk. No contest.

..Lets leave Morris out of this.Thats a Minor...

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lets have "British people of Caribbean origin"


I thought you were asking about "Black people", Tony.


Not all "British people of Caribbean origin" are "Black". Some are "White", some are "Indian", "Chinese", "Arabic" and so on. Or a mixture.


Last time I went to the ballet, the overwhelming majority of the dancers were "White" - and they were very good dancers. Some seemed almost "born to dance".

"Not all "British people of Caribbean origin"


Very good point, my own mum's Kittian and white (Scottish/German half breed). What with my dad being Spanish, what blimmin' Race am I?

We won't even get started on LozzyLoz, I haven't got enough time to describe him before I shoot off to Ireland to get married (Oh my God, my poor kids, really confused)

BJL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lets have "British people of Caribbean origin"

>

> I thought you were asking about "Black people",

> Tony.

>

> Not all "British people of Caribbean origin" are

> "Black". Some are "White", some are "Indian",

> "Chinese", "Arabic" and so on. Or a mixture.

...I realise that BJL which is why in my next post of "2.46" three minutes after the one you have quoted I,specifically,said BLACK British of Caribbean origin.....(tu)

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Not all "British people of Caribbean origin">

> Very good point, my own mum's Kittian and white

> (Scottish/German half breed). What with my dad

> being Spanish, what blimmin' Race am I?

> We won't even get started on LozzyLoz, I haven't

> got enough time to describe him before I shoot off

> to Ireland to get married (Oh my God, my poor

> kids, really confused)

.........Which is why three minutes later I wrote BLACK British of Caribbean origin>:D<

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BJL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lets have "British people of Caribbean

> origin"

> >

> > I thought you were asking about "Black people",

> > Tony.

> >

> > Not all "British people of Caribbean origin"

> are

> > "Black". Some are "White", some are "Indian",

> > "Chinese", "Arabic" and so on. Or a mixture.

>

> ...I realise that BJL which is why in my next post

> of "2.46" three minutes after the one you have

> quoted I,specifically,said BLACK British of

> Caribbean origin.....(tu)


Thanks, Tony - that's much clearer.


But, wait a minute - do you mean really, really "black" people? Not the people who are sort of "dark brown" or "mid brown" or "light brown" or... Like this:


http://www.mediabistro.com/unbeige/original/kular.jpg


And what about those "mixed race" people? Are they "Black" or "White"?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it just me but I feel rather uncomfortable the

> way this thread has gone.

...Not just you Jah Lush which is why I deliberately said "my last word" around 3,000 words ago:-$...


Today, 08:51AM

"!I'll leave MY last word to the most respected contributor to the most prominent Black Forum in The UK as they have a thread about "Black Swimmers"... "

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your last word 3,000 words ago. Surely that's a

> contradiction in terms?

....I was being ironic Jah Lush!,,,,it was my "intention" at the time to be "my last word" until others revived the thread,many with questions directly to me hence the continuation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...