Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I am looking to do a loft extension in my (terraced) house ? however the loft height is far too low to do this at the moment. As it sounds like we aren't allowed to increase the height/pitch of the roof, it has been suggested that we lower the height of the ceilings in the bedrooms and create the space that way. Has anyone had this done? What was your experience like and did it materially affect the ?feel? of the rooms? Also, if anyone has any recommendations for builders who do this kind of work, that would be appreciated.


Thanks.

Had a similar dilemma, we would just reach the minimum height,

but our neighbour (semiterrassed) has a nice high ceiling,2.20 at least.

We had some builders round, all of them guessing a final height.

So we will go with an architect and she worked out a good ceiling

Height for us.

Haven't done it yet, all i am saying is, there are other options too.

One of the builders suggested lowering the ceilings in the first floor,

I am just glad we didn't go that route.

Good luck!

We did this in one of the bedrooms in our old place. Actually the bedroom still felt perfectly OK, even after lowering the ceiling by a foot. If you still have around 240cm height after lowering, it should be fine - but if it would be more like 220cm, then you should think carefully as you might be affecting the saleability.


If it turns out that your ceilings would be unacceptably low, then another option is just building over the rear "outrigger" instead of using the main loft space. In many houses you can get a decent size bedroom with a small ensuite in this area.

I had the same problem - got quotes from a couple of loft conversion companies and an independent builder all of whom said I'd need to have bedroom ceilings lowered - but Classic Lofts eventually carried out the work without lowering any ceilings. They have done a lot of conversions in Landells Road.It might be worth contacting them.

I had the same problem and the only way ahead, for me, was to raise my roof and get my neighbour to raise theirs too. In the end I decided not to go ahead. I didn't get as far as applying for planning permission.


I used Prestige Build who work mainly in SE22 (their vans are becoming ubiquitous). They have many recommendations on this forum. Not cheap but they do top work.

Thanks everyone. I think the height of the walls after the lowering of the ceiling would be just under 2.3m so I'm still not sure. I guess the only thing to do is to have a few people around to look at it and see what options they come up with.



Thanks.

2.3m is not outrageously low, but it is noticeably lower than typical victorian properties, and even pretty low for a new-build.


If it's a choice between (for example) 2.3m on the first floor and 2.2m in the loft, or 2.4m on the first floor and 2.1m in the loft, I'd go for the latter. As LondonMix says, people will be more forgiving of lower ceilings in the loft when it comes to selling.

As long as you have at least 2.1m in the loft, I wouldn't bother lower the ceilings on the first floor unless you plan to make the loft room your master bedroom. Even then, don't go below 2.4m on the first floor if you can help it. Personally, we are staying on the first floor and using the loft room for kids so the low ceiling height doesn't really matter that much.
I know- I said if / if you can help it. If the only option is between 2m above / 2.3 below after lowering it, I agree that would be the right thing probably. However, I wouldn't go below 2.4m on the first floor if the loft could be 2.1m without dropping the ceiling further.

Hi Emmie - we had to do exactly this last year. The ceiling height on the first floor is now 2.4cm & we have our loft room as the master bedroom & it's our favourite room (the loft has the minimum legal ceiling height). We couldn't be more happy with the result. Definitely worth it. We're in a Victorian terrace - if you want to take a look send me a PM


Ali

Hi,


The main issue, as Jeremy said, is that the loft is far too small at the moment to convert, which is why there's a problem. If only Southwark were a little more relaxed about raising the roof height!


Another option I'm considering is leaving the master bedroom as is but only lowering the ceiling of the middle bedroom and hall (the bathroom and small back bedroom obviously already have much lower ceiling heights) - this might make enough space for a bathroom and a bedroom without having to do anything to the main (and nicest!) room. Does anyone know of someone who has done this kind of thing as a compromise?


Ali - it's nice to hear of a positive result! Thanks for the offer - I'm still mulling things over at the moment but that could be really helpful a bit later on.



Thanks.

My old neighbours had the same problem, so they just used the actual loft space for the entry staircase, and built the extension over the outrigger. Still called it a loft conversion and seemingly no permission required, but to be honest it was a sun and light blocking monstrosity (even though it was effectively a third floor on the outrigger they had to dress it in roof tiles, etc to maintain the fiction it was a loft conversion).
  • 2 months later...
We also did this last year, dropping the first floor ceilings by a foot. I think we ended up with something like 2.1 or so in the loft and 2.4 on the first floor. Which in both cases is perfectly good. Try and incorporate as large a velux window/s as possible as it can really take the edge off the impression of a lower ceiling.
  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What nonsense.  It's social mobility.  Huguenots moved to the East End and once they made a bob or two moved to more upmarket areas. Subsequently Jews.  Now Bangladeshi, particularly making a pretty penny once the hipsters moved in.   Antisemitism was a small factor and this was a generation or more ago.   "Jewish people moved out of London's East End between 1900 and the 1950s primarily to escape overcrowded, impoverished conditions and seek better housing and improved social standing in the suburbs." I expect few of us living in the area have witnessed first hand antisemitism.  We may well have seen racism against black, brown people and maybe Eastern Europeans.  Anti Irish sentiment was still prevalent 30 years ago - partly due to the troubles but partly some British superiority complex encouraged by generations of lewd comedians,  Glad that is behind us now.   Why do you have to make such toxic comments?  You'd be better off doing some research and educating yourself.  Here's some reading: https://www.ideastore.co.uk/local-history/collections-and-digital-resources/user-guides/migration-and-communities-in-the-east-end You don't have to thank me.
    • I hear there is a task force on the oceans but I was confused to where it is going - Greenland?  The EU or UK in view that the former has a new trade deal and no doubt the PM is after a new one. @Sephiroth The state sponsored killings in the US and Iran got me thinking.  Whilst the scale is clearly different it's still hypocritical.  Not fact checked but apparently several hundred people are killed each year in the 'States by law enforcement officers.  in the UK it's around a couple so corrected for respective populations a couple of percent of the US figures.
    • The diaspora was largely forced out of the East End a long time ago. The historical antisemitism behind that that is repeating itself again now, very sadly. 
    • Southwark Libraries has copies of all the grades https://southwark.spydus.co.uk/cgi-bin/spydus.exe/FULL/WPAC/BIBENQ/172056040/4862177,1
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...