Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The high street location isn't particularly conventional, but surely a new crossing plus a lolli-person for a couple of hours a day should solve the safety issue? Yes it is a busy road, but vehicles don't travel as fast as they do on Peckham Rye for instance..

One has to take in all practicalities...


Classrooms on a busy road. Traffic Noise. Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?


Pollution:- Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?


Hot weather:- Solution Air conditioning.??? Not good environment especially for young people.

Dry eyes especially when spending time on computer screens. Respiratory problems.


Outside play/exercise area. Not applicable.


Parents driving children to school. Parking. ???


Our kids deserve better.


This is not Foxy being grumpy. It is common sense..


Then Foxy does not have to rely on making himself popular to get votes. ;-)


DulwichFox

For those that jumped down Dulwichfox's throat (which I know is hard to avoid at times), it's not like he said anything outrageous. I too thought about the busy road immediately.


Although I went on to assume they'd add another crossing, and not have the gate right there on LL.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One has to take in all practicalities...

>

> Classrooms on a busy road. Traffic Noise.

> Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?

>

> Pollution:- Solution double glaze and keep

> windows shut.?

>

> Hot weather:- Solution Air conditioning.??? Not

> good environment especially for young people.

> Dry eyes especially when spending time on

> computer screens. Respiratory problems.

>

> Outside play/exercise area. Not applicable.

>

> Parents driving children to school. Parking.

> ???

>

> Our kids deserve better.

>

> This is not Foxy being grumpy. It is common

> sense..

>

> Then Foxy does not have to rely on making himself

> popular to get votes. ;-)

>

> DulwichFox


There are alternatives to aircon. I worked in an office where we had 'cooling rods' served by a cold water cooling system. It was fantastic in summer.

Yep.. If Foxy was to report that .. 'The Station was shut' there would be some people that would

immediately take that as Foxy being negative, not Foxy being helpful.


I don't think they ever actually understand what I write. I try to keep them as short as possible.

I do not feel the need to explain the punch-line so to speak. I assume a certain level of intelligence. :)


DulwichFox Not an actual fox. and not my real name.

It is good to see so many solutions to all possible problems.


Better to have a situation where no problems need to be resolved.


I build computer programs. Good programing is getting it right first time.

Not having to spend hours de-bugging badly written code.


I suppose it's a bit much to expect that from any local authority when it comes to planning ahead.


DF

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it is a terrible idea and for those who

> say that Landcroft is a quiet rd, that would

> change dramatically if a school opens there.


As it would if it opened on any other quiet road. Are you saying it should open onto a busier one that would, presumably, become even busier?


Not being snarky - just that if people object to schools opening on busy and on quiet roads there's not a lot left.

Won't someone think of the children!


Won't someone think of the quiet roads!


Won't someone think about me me me and my narrow view of world!!!


It's a school. In an area that needs one. Won't be first on a busy road and won't be last. Ease off on the nimbyism people


(Anyone got stats on how many horses died from all this traffic when they were stationed there?)

Foxy,


Why don't you get your computer and write some code that:


- meets the need for the shortage of primary schools places in SE22

- is safe

- doesn't need any air conditioning

- doesn't create any extra traffic

- takes advantage of the what's actually available on the market in terms of space at the moment

- doesn't spoil any quiet residential roads

- is conveniently located for the people who need it



...should take a clever bloke like you about 5 mins or so

What SJ and Ron70 said.


Lots of young families moving here, breeding, and needing education and that. I can't think of a better use of space.


What we really don't need are those idiots who drive 4x4 cars so no-one can ever pass them. Please buy smaller cars and get over yourselves - We know you're rich, but you really do block most of East Dulwich. And the world. ;)


And east dulwich is fairly flat. You're not having an "adventure" in your 4x4. You are just causing traffic.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy,

>

> Why don't you get your computer and write some

> code that:

>

> - meets the need for the shortage of primary

> schools places in SE22

> - is safe

> - doesn't need any air conditioning

> - doesn't create any extra traffic

> - takes advantage of the what's actually available

> on the market in terms of space at the moment

> - doesn't spoil any quiet residential roads

> - is conveniently located for the people who need

> it

>

>

> ...should take a clever bloke like you about 5

> mins or so

Computer code is governed by strict syntax and logic.

Council proposals have no concept of either and thereforej

There is no computer or computer language that

Could resolve such a conundrum.


Fox

Jeremy, I don't live on that road but often walk past the site. It seems a very small site for a school with 60 children. If it goes ahead, I do wish it well and hope it is a success. Children benefit from a good sized playground..

People saying that site is too small for 60 children?


That was two rooms when I went to school - how can a place that big not be big enough for 4 rooms


There were countless police, cells, stables yadda yadda. PLENTY room for 60 pupils


But I'm glad I didn't study planning. Turns out all I need to make a decision is 15 seconds on the internet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...