Jump to content

Former ED police station fetches in excess of 5 million!

Louisa

By Louisa
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted
The high street location isn't particularly conventional, but surely a new crossing plus a lolli-person for a couple of hours a day should solve the safety issue? Yes it is a busy road, but vehicles don't travel as fast as they do on Peckham Rye for instance..
DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

One has to take in all practicalities...


Classrooms on a busy road. Traffic Noise. Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?


Pollution:- Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?


Hot weather:- Solution Air conditioning.??? Not good environment especially for young people.

Dry eyes especially when spending time on computer screens. Respiratory problems.


Outside play/exercise area. Not applicable.


Parents driving children to school. Parking. ???


Our kids deserve better.


This is not Foxy being grumpy. It is common sense..


Then Foxy does not have to rely on making himself popular to get votes. ;-)


DulwichFox

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

For those that jumped down Dulwichfox's throat (which I know is hard to avoid at times), it's not like he said anything outrageous. I too thought about the busy road immediately.


Although I went on to assume they'd add another crossing, and not have the gate right there on LL.

EDmummy

EDmummy

Posted
Posted

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One has to take in all practicalities...

>

> Classrooms on a busy road. Traffic Noise.

> Solution double glaze and keep windows shut.?

>

> Pollution:- Solution double glaze and keep

> windows shut.?

>

> Hot weather:- Solution Air conditioning.??? Not

> good environment especially for young people.

> Dry eyes especially when spending time on

> computer screens. Respiratory problems.

>

> Outside play/exercise area. Not applicable.

>

> Parents driving children to school. Parking.

> ???

>

> Our kids deserve better.

>

> This is not Foxy being grumpy. It is common

> sense..

>

> Then Foxy does not have to rely on making himself

> popular to get votes. ;-)

>

> DulwichFox


There are alternatives to aircon. I worked in an office where we had 'cooling rods' served by a cold water cooling system. It was fantastic in summer.

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

Yep.. If Foxy was to report that .. 'The Station was shut' there would be some people that would

immediately take that as Foxy being negative, not Foxy being helpful.


I don't think they ever actually understand what I write. I try to keep them as short as possible.

I do not feel the need to explain the punch-line so to speak. I assume a certain level of intelligence. :)


DulwichFox Not an actual fox. and not my real name.

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

It is good to see so many solutions to all possible problems.


Better to have a situation where no problems need to be resolved.


I build computer programs. Good programing is getting it right first time.

Not having to spend hours de-bugging badly written code.


I suppose it's a bit much to expect that from any local authority when it comes to planning ahead.


DF

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it is a terrible idea and for those who

> say that Landcroft is a quiet rd, that would

> change dramatically if a school opens there.


As it would if it opened on any other quiet road. Are you saying it should open onto a busier one that would, presumably, become even busier?


Not being snarky - just that if people object to schools opening on busy and on quiet roads there's not a lot left.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

Won't someone think of the children!


Won't someone think of the quiet roads!


Won't someone think about me me me and my narrow view of world!!!


It's a school. In an area that needs one. Won't be first on a busy road and won't be last. Ease off on the nimbyism people


(Anyone got stats on how many horses died from all this traffic when they were stationed there?)

????

????

Posted
Posted

Foxy,


Why don't you get your computer and write some code that:


- meets the need for the shortage of primary schools places in SE22

- is safe

- doesn't need any air conditioning

- doesn't create any extra traffic

- takes advantage of the what's actually available on the market in terms of space at the moment

- doesn't spoil any quiet residential roads

- is conveniently located for the people who need it



...should take a clever bloke like you about 5 mins or so

tallulah71

tallulah71

Posted
Posted

What SJ and Ron70 said.


Lots of young families moving here, breeding, and needing education and that. I can't think of a better use of space.


What we really don't need are those idiots who drive 4x4 cars so no-one can ever pass them. Please buy smaller cars and get over yourselves - We know you're rich, but you really do block most of East Dulwich. And the world. ;)


And east dulwich is fairly flat. You're not having an "adventure" in your 4x4. You are just causing traffic.

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy,

>

> Why don't you get your computer and write some

> code that:

>

> - meets the need for the shortage of primary

> schools places in SE22

> - is safe

> - doesn't need any air conditioning

> - doesn't create any extra traffic

> - takes advantage of the what's actually available

> on the market in terms of space at the moment

> - doesn't spoil any quiet residential roads

> - is conveniently located for the people who need

> it

>

>

> ...should take a clever bloke like you about 5

> mins or so

Computer code is governed by strict syntax and logic.

Council proposals have no concept of either and thereforej

There is no computer or computer language that

Could resolve such a conundrum.


Fox

singalto

singalto

Posted
Posted
Jeremy, I don't live on that road but often walk past the site. It seems a very small site for a school with 60 children. If it goes ahead, I do wish it well and hope it is a success. Children benefit from a good sized playground..
StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

People saying that site is too small for 60 children?


That was two rooms when I went to school - how can a place that big not be big enough for 4 rooms


There were countless police, cells, stables yadda yadda. PLENTY room for 60 pupils


But I'm glad I didn't study planning. Turns out all I need to make a decision is 15 seconds on the internet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sephiroth
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • David Peckham
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By David Peckham · Posted

      In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • HeadNun
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • Sephiroth
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...