Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In Starbucks this afternoon having a quiet coffee and within 30 mins it was like crime watch unfolding in front of my eyes......


Firstly a man was frogmarched through the store - I assumed being caught shoplifting.....then 10 mins later the alarms went off and there was a man being held on the floor in what appeared to have been an attempt in snatching someones handbag.....then shortly after two young boys - approx 10 years old were being questioned by security.....


So beware when shopping in Sainsburys and maybe it is time to start shopping on line !


I assume that this was a random afternoon and not the norm

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4070-sainsburys-crime-hot-spot/
Share on other sites

It's on Dog kennel Hill. Opposite the Dog kennel Hill Estate.

Put people on a housing project named Dog Kennel and why be surprised when they start going beyond being riff-raff, they're no doubt now in a whole different classification of ruff!-ruff!

Small wonder Sainsbury's has now become the crime spot it is.

And I know the hill was named for where the Surrey hunts used to kennel their hounds, and Pytchley, Quorn and that other road are named after hunts.

But then our betters were in charge.

The likes of us knew better than to go committing crime where the quality purchased their victuals.

Edgar Kail is the man who in the 1920s played for Dulwich Hamlets. And England.

I read somewhere.


I remember when that store first opened they tried to attract you posh SE22ers by selling stuff like edible flowers, picked and presented all nice in plastic trays. You ungrateful lot.

jim_the_chin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Top tip: Go at 730am,. There's no other people,

> the shelves are stacked full, and the check out

> person was so bored she even put a few of my items

> into bags for me. it cut a good third off

> shopping time.


All well and good JTC, but do you live on the Dog Kennel Hill Estate?

And if you do, how much did you nick?

And if you don't, what were you doing there at that time?

You'll probably say 'shopping', but don't they all.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kford Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sainsbury's are doing victuals two-for-one at

> the

> > mo...

>

> I don't suppose they're organic victuals though.



They were Taste the Difference victuals

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > kford Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sainsbury's are doing victuals two-for-one at

> > the

> > > mo...

> >

> > I don't suppose they're organic victuals

> though.

>

>

> They were Taste the Difference victuals


Hah! In my day the only tsting of difference for a ruffian or cutpurse frequenting a food hall, would be the difference between tasting a violent kick up the backside and a taste of the whip that a gentleman carried with him at all times.

They'd have been glad of it too, and not to receive a thrashing to within a centimetre of their lives.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's on Dog kennel Hill. Opposite the Dog kennel

> Hill Estate.

> Put people on a housing project named Dog Kennel

> and why be surprised when they start going beyond

> being riff-raff, they're no doubt now in a whole

> different classification of ruff!-ruff!

> Small wonder Sainsbury's has now become the crime

> spot it is.


tit

Pongo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's on Dog kennel Hill. Opposite the Dog

> kennel

> > Hill Estate.

> > Put people on a housing project named Dog

> Kennel

> > and why be surprised when they start going

> beyond

> > being riff-raff, they're no doubt now in a

> whole

> > different classification of ruff!-ruff!

> > Small wonder Sainsbury's has now become the

> crime

> > spot it is.

>

> tit


for tat?

Yes!! Oh gosh. I cannot possibly step foot in ghetto of Dog Kennel Hill Sainsburys. Ever since I was slapped round the face with a wet fish as I was innocently buying Kates :( new foundation, I have shopped at the wonderous website of acado.com. Sainsburys is so horrible, full of evil youths and young hippies thinking its cool to hurt the upper middle class with fishes.


Fools!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...