Jump to content

Recommended Posts

stevie23b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


da silva good post !


xxxxxxx


This was DaSilva's post, for those who have forgotten:



"Daily Mail, Mumsnet - I think you might be onto something Pinecone. If I were you, I'd just ignore the EDF's pitchfork-wielding yokels. They just don?t want to have to imagine their cosy, bucolic domain could potentially be disrupted by an icy blast of urban reality - especially when they?re having to fork out so much money to live in this little corner of God?s earthly paradise".



I really can't understand why either of you are posting on here, since you both seem to have such a low opinion of other forum members.

That's a novel perspective to take, Sue. If you look a little more closely at the previous posts on this thread (including your own execrable efforts), I think you'll find it's other posters - not me - who exhibit 'a low opinion of other forum members' by subjecting them to a deeply unpleasant campaign of playground bullying.


Hence, to paraphrase one of your juicier quotes, 'perhaps you should engage your brain before posting - if you have one'.

This is awful to read . Someone has been stabbed boy or girl woman or man good citizen or awful drug dealer and as always the subject has to change into a different subject and personal bickering and attack . Why don't the people on here who feel they have to hijack each subject or question just meet up and go to a pub and sort it out or start your own forum !

dimples Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No sue not at all but I agree with the last

> message OTTA left , a lot of the messages on here

> do tend to become a slagging match don't you think

> !


xxxxxx


Well, it's a forum. That's what happens on forums!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Well, it's a forum. That's what happens on forums!


Not necessarily. I know of at least one that is always good humoured and well mannered - and very informative and entertaining.

It can be done, honestly.

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Well, it's a forum. That's what happens on

> forums!

>

> Not necessarily. I know of at least one that is

> always good humoured and well mannered - and very

> informative and entertaining.

> It can be done, honestly.


xxxxxx


I'm sure it can be done!


But I'd be willing to bet that the forum of which you speak does not consist of members whose main if only thing in common (grammar?) is that they live in roughly the same geographical location - am I right?


And I bet it's very heavily moderated so that trolls and unpleasant people are kicked off it at the first sign of not being good-humoured and well-mannered?


This forum, because of its nature, is bound to have members with a wide cross-section of views and personalities, and therefore disputes are bound to arise.


I think it generally has a good balance - really vile people are banned, but otherwise posters are able to state their opinions freely on the whole. I think that's a healthy thing. It would be worrying if they couldn't.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have no agenda just a simple response expressing my thoughts and experience.  
    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...