Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do the majority of Catholics agree with what the pope is saying?


Forget agree, do most catholics actually know what he is saying? Admittedly, I am not catholic, so may lack the gift, but I heard this on the news this morning, and I've read the link from Sean, and yet I haven't got a clue what he's actually trying to say!


I'm not 100% sure he actually knows what he is saying.

Has anyone considered the possibility that the aging Pope is the Vatican equivalent of Phil, Duke of Edinburgh - old, slightly bigotted, few remaining marbles and poor impulse control, occsaionally drops casual verbal bombshells that don't represent the more diplomatic standpoint of the rest of his group? Just a thought.


Agree, tho, that he'd never issue a statement in similar tones regarding a racial group. Very much a point in favour of James' arguement, which I confess to poo-pooing at an earlier stage/page



(edited for getting m'names muddled!)

I was raised a Catholic and it was this sort of thing that was the final straw for me and religion.


I have a horrible feeling my mum still believes in this sort of bigoted c**p... even my dad who isn't religious thinks that homosexuality is a mental illness... and worst of all, my uncle once described homosexuality as being only one step up from peadophilia, and I think he really meant it (he isn't religious either)


It's not a subject I care to discuss with my family now because I find their views so offensive and no matter what I said, they wouldn't change them.


I don't think all Catholics universally follow what the pope says though - I went to a Catholic school and most of the girls didn't come from huge families - plenty were just two child families like mine. And my mum said the local priest used to tell female parishioners that contraception was between them and their concience and he wouldn't tell them not to use it.


Having said that, my mum was always a follower of the old vatican roulette method... tough the gamble paid off for her. However, I certainly wouldn't fancy having to stick a thermometer up my a**e every morning to check my temperature & work out if it was safe to have sex!

I 'possibly' don't know enough about this to argue it theologically, but what I find fascinating is the fact that the Pope felt the need /chose to say this stuff.


Genuine question - why? What was he hoping to achieve?. Or have we got ten seconds of a four hour speech blown up?

I think that this pope is an 'intellectual theologan' whereas the last pope was more from the heart. He therefore ruminates on the theological questions without any empathy about what the effect of his philisophical meanderings (er, prejudice) may have in the real world....I genuinely don't think he means to stir up bigoted hatred but that's no defence for a man in his position whose words obviously will....

You see my parents are both very religious and involved with the church but they never, even when we were kids tried to force us to go to church. They never tried to force the church?s beliefs on us either. In fact their own views are considerably more liberal than the crap the church peddles. They certainly wouldn?t agree that ?homosexual behaviour? is something the world needs saving from.


They are both also a lot more knowledgeable and well informed about religion in general and the teachings and political functioning of the church than most other Catholics I meet.


Oddly they still seem to see some kind of value (be it spiritual, moral or social) in being part of the church.


So I guess not all Catholics believe all this crap and it is still possible to consider yourself catholic or even be an active practicing Catholic and disagree with what the church says on certain issues.


I?m still not getting up to go to mass tomorrow though.

  • 4 months later...

I would have hoped that a centre left govt, of a mainly secular nature, and with nothing to lose in terms of opinion polls would have grown a pair and made this compulsory for EVERY child with no opt out for parents.


And banned faith schools from preaching any of this cobblers about the abomination of homosexuality or sex outside marriage.


But no.


I soMetimes genuinely despair. This is one of those times.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have hoped that a centre left govt, of a

> mainly secular nature, and with nothing to lose in

> terms of opinion polls would have grown a pair and

> made this compulsory for EVERY child with no opt

> out for parents.

>

> And banned faith schools from preaching any of

> this cobblers about the abomination of

> homosexuality or sex outside marriage.

>

> But no.

>

> I soMetimes genuinely despair. This is one of

> those times.


I think you've forgotten what religion our previous beloved leader, Mr Blair, recently converted to..

Woah there. I didn't make any further judgements on the man; merely I highlighted his record on homosexuality - which was good. Civil partnerships? Gay adoption? Workplace equality? All under Blair's Labour.


I believe Ruth Kelly is the only devout member of the govt so this dithering is especially galling in the way it panders to religious interest groups.

C'mon, this development is an expedient fudge just like many other things in politics. In order to get all that important PSHE info to the majority of children it was decided to make that concession to Christian groups. Better to get that message accross to most kids than to take on the political timebomb that is the issue of religious schools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Dulwich Gails
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...