Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to let people know ....


I received a message from my bank this morning regarding suspicious activity on my credit card ..... turns out that someone in The Rye tried to use my details between 6:30 \ 8am this morning to the tune of ?150.


Only people I can think of who would be in a pub at that time in the morning are the cleaners or the staff having an extended lock in from the night before ....

fair enough Tony but it strikes me as odd that a pub that does so much business with credit cards behind the bar would play fast and loose like this - reputationally it would kill them if it was to come out


have you raised it with pub management and the fact that the card is new and only been used there?

bigtony2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>turns out that someone in The Rye tried to

> use my details between 6:30 \ 8am this morning to

> the tune of ?150.

>


xxxxx


Then the pub would have the details on their card machine records, surely, and would see that something was wrong if there was a transaction going through at that time?

bigtony2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> .. its a new card and the only place I have used

> it was in The Rye.


Have you actually been told by the card company that the attempted use was made on the Rye premises, or named the Rye as address? Did the card company mention the Rye?

The transaction never went through because the bank flagged it as suspect and prevented it from happening ... there was an attempt.


It is in the banks hands now as to how they deal with this. No mony was taken from me so I am actually not that bothered.


New card is in the post apparently .....


.... ps. I will still use The Rye as they show the football ! ..... I will just pay in cash fom now.

Inbetween yes and no - you simply don't know, haven't contacted the Rye, and are posting unsubstantiated rumours on a public forum.


You haven't been sent a new card, or PIN? Which suggests it's an error on the bank's part, otherwise they would have stopped your card?


Poor form...

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You haven't been sent a new card, or PIN? Which

> suggests it's an error on the bank's part,

> otherwise they would have stopped your card?

>

> Poor form...


The OP has already said that a new card has been sent.

Best to read the whole thread before piling in...poor form

Why not help the Rye to investigate it bigtony2 ?


They don't want to employ anyone who may be capable of theft (attempted or otherwise). I think you have lost support because you posted a serious allegation about possibly a member of staff at a local business, and when the manager of that business expresses concern and asks for details so that he can address what might be a serious allegation for the reputation of his business, you just dismiss his efforts with a 'I'm not that bothered'. You were though obviously bothered enough to make a public declaration, which as someone posted above was unfair before speaking to the business itself first.


I think the Rye Pub have shown themselves to be anything but a fraudulant business.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > You haven't been sent a new card, or PIN?

> Which

> > suggests it's an error on the bank's part,

> > otherwise they would have stopped your card?

> >

> > Poor form...

>

> The OP has already said that a new card has been

> sent.

> Best to read the whole thread before piling

> in...poor form


Doesn't say if his existing card had been stopped. Point taken on your second!

When this happened to me - I saw it as the banks business, not mine. they refunded me - the fraud was against them not me.


Sometimes there are internal bank issues or it's part of an ongoing larger fraud investigation - and you have no idea. The pub could easily be a patsy which is why the thread should probably go.

It doesn't make any sense to me. How would a bank know that a fraudulent transaction was being attempted from the pub, unless someone was trying to buy something in there - hardly likely when the place is shut (and without physically having the card). Or had the person somehow obtained the card number from the pub's card machine and was trying to buy something by phone or on the internet, without knowing the address of the cardholder or the last 3 numbers on the back of the card. I don't get it.

My guess is the phone call from "the bank",if genuine, was referring to bigtony2's actual use of the card in the pub, or, if not, a scam to obtain his card details from him.

Funny you say that. Not been in for ages, popped in tonight for a pint after work. Thread must have put it in my mind.


ETA...I don't think The Rye are at it in terms of publicity by the way.


John Brady Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They do say there's nothing like free publicity.

> I mean even if it cost them a hundred and fifty

> quid I think the pub has come out of this well.

>

> Or maybe I have misunderstood.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...