Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The irony that we've been putting too many people who shouldn't have gone through university through it to service our "knowledge" economy just as the whole kaboodle collapses and what we need to pull us our economic catastrophe are some good old fashioned technichal, engineering and *hush words* manufacturing skills hasn't escaped an old cynic such as myself..

???? Wrote:

what we need to pull us our economic catastrophe are some good old fashioned technichal, engineering and *hush words*

manufacturing skills hasn't escaped an old cynic such as myself..


They are still around Quidsy!..trouble is they are around Sydney,Australia.....Houston,Texas...Toronto,Canada and Wellington,New Zealand.

We have lost 5.5 Million Brits who have emigrated in the last 10 years and,by definition,many of these Guys will be skilled so as to pass the (relatively) stringent criteria to be allowed to emigrate to those Countries in the first place....

Nah, globally the average % of populations working in industry is 32%. We have 23.6%, whereas a heavily industrialised country such as China has 48.6%


Australia has 26.4%, Canada has 28.8%, conversely the US has 19.8%.


Manufacturing generally employs disempowered gophers, not engineers. One engineer can design a machine for 10,000 factories that are made and operated by plebs. Manufacturing delivers efficiencies through proximity to resources or slave labour. In the UK we have neither and so we can't compete.


However, service companies trade on intellectual property, ingenuity and process - at which the Brits are very good. It doesn't need to be close to market, so wehave no increased costs from distance.


Expats like me leave because the UK is populated my miserable gits, it's a shoddy climate and there's too much competition. Not that I don't love you all of course.


By far the overriding influence is the first. We pour scorn on success and whinge tirelessly about our failings. We have no national identity because we have no aspirational values. We don't know our strengths because we lack the imagination to put ourselves in someone else's shoes. We deride our public servants whilst sitting on our fat arses in front of the telly.


I mean, for crissakes, we're scared of our own children.


These are fundamentals, if we get these right then the schools, the hospitals will follow without legislation. Because we're too lazy to do that, we ask the government to provide laws. Pathetic.

Huguenot Wrote:

Expats like me leave because the UK is populated by miserable gits,.....


By far the overriding influence is the first. We pour scorn on success and whinge tirelessly about our failings. We have no national identity because we have no aspirational values. We don't know our strengths because we lack the imagination to put ourselves in someone else's shoes. We deride our public servants whilst sitting on our fat arses in front of the telly. I mean, for crissakes, we're scared of our own children.

These are fundamentals, if we get these right then the schools, the hospitals will follow without legislation. Because we're too lazy to do that, we ask the government to provide laws. Pathetic.


Well,at least,no-one can accuse you of that Huguenot!:)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah, globally the average % of populations working

> in industry is 32%. We have 23.6%, whereas a

> heavily industrialised country such as China has

> 48.6%

>

> Australia has 26.4%, Canada has 28.8%, conversely

> the US has 19.8%.


What about mining and agriculture?

Well, I can't see what percentage of population are working in the armed forces, but as a % of total GDP defence spending is estimated as follows;


UK 2.4%


Australia 2.4%

Canada 1.1%

South Africa 1.7%

US 4.1%


China 4.3%

India 2.5%


Just coz it's military, I though I'd add...


Russia 3.9%


Interesting that it's the three 'superpowers' that spend the most on the military, almost as if their size has made them more, not less paranoid.


However, since this thread is about Education, percentage of GDP spent on education...


UK 5.6%

Australia 4.5%

Canada 5.2%

South Africa 5.4%

US 5.3%


China 1.9%

India 3.2%

Russia 3.8%


So we certainly care enough about our kiddies to pay for their education.


Some high performing countries in education do spend a little more - Finland 6.4%. However other top scorers such as Japan and Singapore spend siginficantly less: 3.5% and 3.7% respectively. It only goes to show that throwing cash at a problem isn't the solution.

Except in Finland. So investing large sums isn't always the answer.


I quite like macroban's idea of mixed schools but single sex alternate years. The bureaucracy involved might intially be tricky but it might solve the traditional dilemmas of educational attainment and social integration.


I think to come out of an all-boys school after 7 years and be anything less than a social leper around woman is a good achievement. Those without sisters would struggle even more I would offer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...