Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What Pizza.?

> >

> > Were you serious about spotting me queuing at

> > Franco Manca.?

> >

> > Queuing ?

> >

> > I can assure you that will never happen.

> >

> > Foxy

>

>

> My other half said he saw you .....

>

> Possibly he is visually challenged .....



Should of gone to Specsavers.. :)


Maybe I was trying to squeeze through the mob and taking a sneaky peek inside.


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought there was no need to actually do that.



I've no idea what Iceland or any of the supermarkets do but I do know that sometimes lobsters & crabs are cooked before they are frozen.

So you can't help wondering if they've been boiled alive.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2825920/

> Is-5-lobster-worth-shelling-height-luxury-global-l

> obster-glut-means-s-cheap-chips.html

>

> Lidl beats Iceland - they are both rated over

> Waitrose


yup.

I like Franco Manca, it's really decent pizza.


However, please can we make sure we don't forget the wonderful Il Mirto on Melbourne Grove? I've eaten a hell of a lot of FM and it just doesn't beat this family-run Sardinian gem. It's so unpretentious and the food is nothing short of exquisite. Still very reasonably priced too, AND BYO on a Wednesday.


Go to Franco Manca, but don't forget Il Mirto ? it's way more legit. Plus you won't have to queue!

We now seem to have two threads running simultaneously about Franco Manca, and now people (well, one person) has posted the same post on both of them.


This thread is headed Draft House, so can't we let this one die and move discussion about Franco Manca to the other one, to avoid (my) total confusion??


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1427039

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...