Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He left a message about 'news on the position'. I was hoping it

would be about an interview...but I dont think it was!!


Perhaps you miss heard Weegee and said 'watch the news on our position'


You dont need the news when you have ed forum because Ladygooner had the full SP on hbos and Lloyds first.

mockney piers wrote:-so not sure why the thought of AIG going tits up or lloyds 'folding' would be so welcome.


Not at all welcome as far as I am concerned mockers,

when these things collapse, no one knows the depth to which it will fall, and re-starting the economy from a position of debt makes it more difficult to rescue.


When a bank gets bailed out like Northern wreck, it is tougher to save the next one, so now they just merge and hope that the all important confidence, is maintained.


A few years ago Lloyds brokers were in the news when they had a number of syndicates go to the wall and it was described as a house of cards due to lots of reinsurance business being connected, no one realised how shakey it all was.


I personally much prefer to maintain the status quo rather than any dangerous financial failures.

Well, I'm probably going to lose my job, but due to the bank I work for being taken over rather than this week's events.


Worth bearing in mind that investment banking is massively regulated, and compliance with regulations is an ever-present topic and obligation. In this country the regulations are set by the FSA. Maybe give a thought to their role in this?

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I'm probably going to lose my job, but due

> to the bank I work for being taken over rather

> than this week's events.

>

> Worth bearing in mind that investment banking is

> massively regulated, and compliance with

> regulations is an ever-present topic and

> obligation. In this country the regulations are

> set by the FSA. Maybe give a thought to their role

> in this?



Hmmm


not in my ( long ) experience


The cynic would say The FSA is a de facto trade group, funded by the banks themselves - regulation is usually a reaction to a scandal, as the banks cry fould when anyone tries to get involved in their "rightful" business - there is a great deal of pussyfooting arou8nd - the Banks Bully the regulators and bully their auditors, knowing they can get away with it


The big few auditots have less idea of how to value a complex product that the babks do, and a bit of back testing ( based on the banks own information ) is usually enough to get the audit signed off - remember Enron? better to tuern a blind eye than lose a contract


The markets themselves are usually SRO's - self regulators and if anyone has experinced compliance issues with , for example, the base Metals markets, you will understand that they are toothless when it comes to forcing anyone of influence, to tow the line


The products that have gone pear shaped are hardly regulated, just because of the obtuse nature of the product and the inability to determoine accurate valuations, often due the to the opaque nature of these illiquid contracts


Compliance isn bandied about, but the reality is that making ? take priority

The FSA have as sharp a teeth as the government allows them, and this government have indulged the city by leaning on the teeth to have blind eyes...or something.


The likes of Gordon Brown, Northern Rock et al have been far too optimistic that the good times will roll on, and of course they never do. But noone seems to have sufficiently planned for that. Hedging is not saving after all is it.


I liked Hislop on Question Time the other night, pointing out that Northern Rock and Halifax used to be building societies, and their bespectacled model of lending what you had may have been boring but at least it was safe. Then said that a couple of years ago Lloyds were being criticised for playing it too safe and falling behind their competitors; but who had to bail out HBOS...?

The FSA has not much bite

Anyone with any ability in FS (but no morals, so that's most) has spent the last 10 years earning squillions rather than working for a toothless ineffective regulator getting paid peanuts (relatively)

All the brains are with the bankers who run rings round the toothless, 2nd Rate, FSA.....


...er that's it....

I know one person who works for the FSA. He is a total fud. Whether he is a lazy fud, I don't know, but I do know he is a childish, selfish, preening, obnoxious, bigoted, prep-school-hero-kind of a fud.


So I don't think merely lazy cuts it at the FSA. Sorry to disappoint you, Brendan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have a warning from EE that they're undertaking work locally to me, I'm assuming the south end of Underhill, over the next 5 days so there may be a temporary reduction in service. Otherwise it's fine. In case you suddenly hear adverse comments, problems may only be short lived. 
    • For those of us in Forest Hill this is great news.  As well as a better connection to Clapham, a quicker route to Catford is very welcome, as we often use Catford stations a lot for the Thameslink and to go down to Bromley and Beckenham. A stop in Brixton would be welcome.  Yes we have the P4.  But have you ever used the P4?
    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...