Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FJDGoose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > people saying 'can I get...!' all over the

> place

>

> It is spreading like a disease. Glad I don't work

> in an industry where I had to face that all day as

> I would feel duty bound to correct the user.



So do I , ten minutes of it in a cafe is enough for me .

That's the point SJ I've never had to get on a bus I'd rather walk or if it's long distance drive! I think without buses London would be easier to get around for everyone- I mean even without a car you could cycle or walk into central london in around 45minutes or less. Just my personal opinion.


Louisa.

I hear people talking about 'apps' all the time and how they can become addictive? Are they like games or something? Or more general purpose? I can totally appreciate how these things would be great to keep kids amused. I just personally think for an adult, you may as well have a laptop- I'm guessing a tablet is more of a fun thing than something to write emails with? Am I wrong?


Louisa.

an app is literally just an app(lication) like any software you can get for a computer. It's just on ipads (and to a lesser extent on android devices) the market is tightly controlled, so you have to buy them online from Apple's appstore and install them from the ether.


Tablet's do have limitations compared to a laptop, but they have strengths too. There's no tedious booting up, they're very light and use much less power. For browsing your usual sites it's actually much less hassle to use one.


Some apps are useful. Addictive? I dunno, there was talk about candy crush and that game the developer withdrew, but I don't think that's an aspect of apps per se, more that people always have their phone with them and can become obssessive about stuff, whether social media or these games that reward regular visits, and try to encourage micro-purchases.

"I think without buses London would be easier to get around for everyone"


How does someone even think this without getting sucked into some kind of stupidity/implausibility vortex and then exploding into a million pieces?


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244332/annual-bus-statistics-2012-13.pdf


There are over 2 BILLION bus journeys in London every year. 2 BILLION! A BILLION, X 2. 2 000 000 000.


But hey, I'm sure all of those journeys could be done more easily by people walking, cycling and driving. NOT.

They're slow, they clog up already busy roads and are deeply annoying to be stuck behind! From a totally non-biased point of view, I think abandoning buses and taking to walking short distances and using bicycles for journeys into and out of the centre, we would have a much easier time of things on London's roads. Buses are great for a view from the top deck but remain incredibly overcrowded even outside of peak times. I'm not saying do away with buses- I'm saying cut down on their use .


The 'app' sounds different- thanks for the explanation El Pibe, I don't think I will rush out to buy a tablet just yet but at least I now understand what it's meant for to an extent. I've never actually held one, I may pop to Curry's and have a fondle at the weekend.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...