Jump to content

Recommended Posts

not talking about any individuals here, but using the scenario..


Jimmy - I hear what you are saying but it's not about rewarding people from what I can tell - policies like this exist(ed) to


a) acknowledge the fact that some people just can't function as well as others.

b) by containing that problem, on balance, society benefits in a way it wouldn't if some of those people were on the street and possibly resoorting to assault, muggings etc


I'm generalising to make a point but I do agree with the maxim that a society can be judged on how it treats it's most vulnerable. The situation you found yourself in sounds woeful but you clearly possess the faculties to turn things around (as most people do)




Is fair enough, but what informs that opinion? And jealousy doesn't count

At what point is someone classified as 'vulnerable'? Is the mugger on the street 'Vulnerable' because somewhere down the line he was traumatized? I'm not sure if these people were vulnerable or not and I don't know what process was used to decide if they were, but they clearly appeared to make their neighbours lives a misery. I have sympathy for anyone who has been dealt a crap hand in life, but I still think most people ,on some level,know the difference between right and wrong in spite of how their lives have panned out. These people may have had problems but in what part of their minds did they consider harrassing and intimidating neighbours whilst drunk acceptable? This is why I think they don't deserve help. It sounds to me that the real vulnerable people in this situation were their neighbours.

Okay, I?m just guessing here but I think they would have been assessed by a social worker under community care legislation. They would have had to have a need for assistance such as a mental health problem or a disability, or they came out of a long stay institution or were brought up in a care home - drug and alcohol misuse don?t count as having ?a need.?


It sounds like they just weren't able to cope - I wouldn't have wanted to live next to them but I'm glad they seem to have been moved on to someplace more appropriate.

jimmyTT I agree whole heartedly that far too much is thrown away on the ne'erdowells, and the honest and upright citizen is not cherished when they are down on their luck.

I am a firm believer in the welfare state but not for the work shy, selfish, asbo collecting, no-hoper.




Sweetgirl we can only hope that someone or something somewhere has knocked the whistle out of him.

Perhaps there is a case for these dangerous bendy buses after all, especially if he's ended up under one.

We wouldn't get that lucky I don't suppose.

NEWSFLASH!!!!!! LOL.


i was right, whistler been nicked! saw it in southwark news today, read the southwark news, page 8, in the dock.....




can't seem to find online, was gonna put a link on here!


i've edited my post, it unfortunate for me to be surrounded by all of this!:(

Sweetgirl, you have anonymity on here, at least grant this human being the same right, as I think any news story would until he's actually been convicted of something, which he probably won't be!


FFS


Edited to say good work for removing the name, I think it was a good thing to do.

keef..... his name is on the paper & it says the road he lives on! have a read it also says what he got up to. if my memory serves me right, it says he has an asbo lasting 2yrs! although to my knowledge the asbo expires 1 april 2009.


if i have breached any rules of this forum i'd like to think the moderators would let me know.

Well said Keef.


Sweetgirl, I haven't looked back through all your old posts, but from memory I can't remember you posting anything positive about anything. That and the fact that, as Asset points out, you seem to really enjoy the misfortune of others, is I think what Keef is referring to rather than out and out rule breaking.

annaj... i live very close to these people, maybe its cos im so close to them & i've had to put up with it!

i don't enjoy hearing the verbal abuse from them, wether its to me or others. luckily for you, you obviously haven't been at the recieving end of it!


i have children too, i don't like to expose them to certain behaviour!

When it said in the bible that the meek would inherit the earth, I think JC got it slightly wrong, because it seems the tight-arsed whingers have inherited the earth and shoved all the weird and wonderful, non-conformists down some big pit somewhere.

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> he's getting a fair amount of abuse on here from

> some people who obviously wouldn't dream of saying

> anything to his face.


Asset et al ... dont think we should go any further into details here. The Whistler is known by the police and I have been warned to steer clear of him. He's launched unprovoked and unwarranted verbal attacks on my other half which I can't even begin to go into detail on.


The fact that many people wouldn't say anything to him is people erring on the side of caution rather than being 2 faced or lacking in balls to say anything. Equally it's probably unfair to lay into the guy on this forum now that he is seemingly out of the way. What's done is done... but please don't under estimate what certain people have had to go through living in Whateley Road. Just because it hasn't happened to some on this forum .. doesnt mean it hasn't happened. Hope that makes sense?


I know a great deal about the guy and suffice to say I'm happy he's gone.. but probably best we all leave it there. I doubt that'll be the case though..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
    • Looks great! but could it be possible to pinch the frames a bit tighter with some long nose pliers and add more struts to stop the tree rats getting inside? Also, the only issue with a mesh base is that it could attract rats towards your property.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...