Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh I see.


It was a strong way of putting it, but I do think it's a huge set back, and I thought disadvantage wasn't enough. Or are you saying that one should not say 'disabled' at all? It's not considered acceptable to refer to people as 'disabled', is the word itself also tabu?

I think on the previous page I had made the same case as you - I think I used the term "will give you an advantage over everyone else after the same thing" for those who can write and speak proper-like


I don't really mind either disadvantaged or disabled - I wouldn't call either taboo. Similarly with childfree and childless - but I can see how they mean slightly different things


Phew - to recap - I wasn't actually picking you up on anything - just referencing a similar thread from yesterday - or so I thought! Right - I'm off now...

Moos Wrote:

Pint. You. When you show up to a Forum drink. Wherever it is. By the exchange of monies for goods.

> Why? Finally a good question. To show friendliness in spite of grammatical and syntactical arsery.


Love to,however,disingenously these always seem to be arranged on the first evening that I have to work every week. i.e.Friday.(6)

I wouldn't mind but I only have to attend my current work on Friday and most of Saturday.:'(

Seriously for aq moment, that's not an easy one to quantify.


My (comprehensive) education was excellent but I know my old school has gone to pot, partly through half the schools in the town being closed down while the remaining schools both doubled in size, partly because, in order to fund said 'cost saving' strategy, experienced teachers were given involuntary redundancy and school leavers were hired to fill the vacancies.

Short sighted strategy that will take decades to fully recover from.


How can you measure an education? Ask labour and they'll chuck a bunch of league tables, exam results and so forth at it, but what was so good about my school was that so much of what we were taught had nothing to do with the curriculum, but encouraging the kids to think for themselves (plus it was pre national curriculum so veering away from the text book was not an issue).


In short, impossible to answer, but the best placed to answer is the educatee I guess, judging the quality of the teaching and their own participation in retrospect.

How do you feel about yours?

I loved school.


It was full of scallys and we had a laugh, but we did a lot of sports and some teachers taught us a lot. I had a great Maths teacher and Biology teacher, my Physics teacher was crap and my Chemistry was ok, but I loved learning so I did ok.


I wasn't given homework until I got to secondary school and we did fine.


In contrast, my youngest hated school by the age of 6, the others were in their teens by the time they hated school.


They didn't really get a lot of homework until league tables were in full force and my youngest was getting it at age 4.


I used to try to make her do it, until I remembered I hadn't had to do any at her age and I'd loved school.


I tried on and off to get her to do it, but after she lost about 4 homework books in a couple of months and I found homework shoved in the bin, I eased up!


Now she is 9 and loves school.


She does lots of after school activities and some homework, but I don't stress her out anymore.


She is smart, she will get where she wants to be in her own time so stuff the homework and the league tables. I think it's more important to learn how to be happy and learn the stuff that inspires you, instead of having shit you have no interest in, being shoved down your throat.

We're not going to enjoy all lessons, but it's still important to get something of a rounded education, so i think it's still important to go to lessons that don't interest you prior to GCSEs.

But agree that encouraging and inspiring (and a great teacher can do that even with an unpopular subject) is more important than stuffing stuff down throats.


I'm glad your kids are enjoying school, long may it continue.


ps I should briefly point out that I may have juxtaposed national curriculum and obsession with stats implying that the former was also labours fault. It was a Tory policy and I'm sorry if I unintentionally misled.


pps was going to make another stuff joke, but it would have been far too blue for the forum's sensibilities ;)

Good education =


- ability to communicate your thoughts, opinions and needs verbally and in writing

- ability to calculate and not to be afraid of numbers

- knowing how to find what you need to know, where to go and what to ask

- continued interest in learning new things

- enough qualifications to get you the job you want


Nice to haves

- ability to speak a language other than your own

- understanding the lessons and patterns of history

- understanding what the world is made of and the basics of natural laws

- interest in playing a sport

- ability to sing or play an instrument


That's what comes to mind, would anyone care to refine?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...