Jump to content

Things that have made me laugh 2


mockney piers

Recommended Posts

So MP and Ruffers, those are what made you laugh? They caused an involuntary spasm of mirth, did they?

No they didn't. You know they didn't. They couldn't possibly have.

Neither of the above is capable of triggering laughter, because they were never intended to.

MP, that thing with the circle and Gideon Bible? To LAUGH? What? The same sort of thing presented to me in a pub, I'd be lookng over the shoulder of the so-called LAUGHTER merchant, wondering where the funniness might be.

To present the dry scraps above as capable of inspiring laughter, is to attempt to wring more out of them than they ever possessed.


So, what makes me laugh? Wouldn't you like to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being called a 'total tool' by Keef for bad

> mouthing the whistler.

>

> Made me laugh anyway.


xxxxxx


You didn't "bad mouth" the whistler.


You said you wished he would go under a bus.


That's why Keef called you a total tool.


Don't know why you thought it was funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keef calling me total tool was as if he had completely washed his hands of me, and thought I was not worth any further effort on his part.


It made me laugh that I had totally and completely disgusted him.

He could not begin to explain, the chasm between us just too great, I was just sooooo out of order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
    • Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...