Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As has been pointed out, no one actually self identifies as a 'hipster'. It can't be said to be any kind of tribe, or movement, in the way that punk, or goths or whatever were. It's just a pretty vague label applied by miserablists to any bloke who looks or acts in a way that they think is a bit silly, or who vaguely follows fashion.

The tribe thing is a bit of a red herring IMHO. A tribe in this context is just a group whose lifestyle is more defined and overt than others. And everyone's prone to lifestyle-ing, to a greater or lesser extent - imagine how tiring it would be to have to actually decide exactly what you, as a unique individual, wants/thinks/feels about absolutely everything. It used to be a source of endless amusement to me that every single Saab owner thought they were a free-thinking individualist.


Anyway, hipsters. They are not likely to punch me in the face, or do anything more generally anti-social, so they can carry on as far as I'm concerned, whoever they are. Having a pop at them for looking silly misses the point somewhat (plus Goths have perpetual dibs on the most ridiculous look ever), and anybody who thinks that a lack of explicit political engagement is a crushing indictment of a style collective because:


"what we need now more than ever is a fight for social and political change."


seriously needs a hot cup of tea and a long lie down (sorry EP, but it's true).


And if nice food and good beer are somehow a product, directly or otherwise, of the hipster thing, excellent - more of that please.

But which tribe? Beards and bicycles at Look Mum No Hands, snow washed denim rave at Dalston Roofpart, or neon health freaks at Morning Gloryville? There isn't one tribe of "hipsters", it's just nonsense.


And don't get your knickers in a twist. Your 'bravo' comment wasn't rude?

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But which tribe? Beards and bicycles at Look Mum

> No Hands, snow washed denim rave at Dalston

> Roofpart, or neon health freaks at Morning

> Gloryville? There isn't one tribe of "hipsters",

> it's just nonsense.



Didn't we establish pages ago that the whole thing is a nonsense and that all the people / groups you mention are not in fact hipsters?



>

> And don't get your knickers in a twist. Your

> 'bravo' comment wasn't rude?



More sarcastic I'd say, but either way it was retaliation.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But which tribe? Beards and bicycles at Look Mum

> No Hands, snow washed denim rave at Dalston

> Roofpart, or neon health freaks at Morning

> Gloryville? There isn't one tribe of "hipsters",

> it's just nonsense.


Tribes tend to have sub-cultures within them. Punk was a catch-all generic term, as is Hipster...

Can't this whole thread just be deleted deleted, because I don't think any two people are really talking about the same thing.


I'm certainly not talking about any of the people Rosie earlier mentioned. And I'm definitely not talking about the successful people Seabag mentioned.


I'm talking about the people that have ensured that when I went to look for some new glasses, EVERY bloody pair was thick black rimmed.


Although I will admit to a level of jealousy(as Seabag suggested) towards anyone who's time and life is their own.


But this thread has gone from a bit of a moan about a youth culture (which has been happening for as long as there has been youth) to something which feels slightly unpleasant to me.


Nothing I've said on the thread (going right back to my initial DHFC comment) has been meant as anything other than light hearted. Except the bit about dressing up as Edwardian gentry (which by the way I'd never have labelled hipster - which is another example of how no one actually knows what a hipster is). I just find that particular group of junior right wingers a bit distasteful.

I think some of you may be taking this a bit too seriously. The older generation laughing affectionately at the younger is a longstanding custom in this country, just as much as the younger mocking the establishment. They'll do the same when they're older.


Seen on a poster in the lift at Hospital today:


'Can you make a career out of blogging or are Generation Y living in a fantasy world when it comes to work?'

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> 'Can you make a career out of blogging or are

> Generation Y living in a fantasy world when it

> comes to work?'



Some people have made an absolute fortune out of blogging or vlogging. Most won't though.


Bit like bands really. Some will just be there at the right time and place, others who may be just as (or more) talented simply won't.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't saying you're a hipster mean you're not

> allowed to be a hipster?


Ah yes but, i've been outed by others so I self refer as 'Hipster'


However, my sub-group reference is as yet 'undifined' so the above term is a mere refrerence point, for the easing of conversation on this Forum


I hope this makes things clearer


I am tho a #Foodster (that's a Hashtag Foodster)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...