Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrsMcc and thecaptain- there are clearly differing views on this. Personally, I find it pretty disgusting - both the sight in the street and the smell.


I wonder, would you mind letting me know your address (dm me if you'd prefer not to post it in a public forum) and I'll direct the men with weak bladders to your door when I come across them in my street.


Perhaps we could provide a "we love piss here" map?

I don't think anyone has said they actually like people pissing, they've just said it's not really a big deal in the grand scheme of things.


And Nigello, why would not particul;arly caring about people having a piss mean that a person's house would be grubby? What a stupid thing to say.



At the ed of the day there are two separate issues here as far as I can see.


1. Is it okay for a person to find somewhere discreet to have a wee if they really need to go?


2. Is it okay to pee right on a pavement in front of someone's house or something like that?



For me they are two totally different things. Trying to find a little dark allyway is very different to just getting it out and pissing on someone's front fence.

It seems 10 May was a Saturday, so the bloke had probably been on the beer for the day. Therefore probably not in a position to make as rational a judgement as some people by the time 830 pm came around.


Its not good behaviour, but probably not a regular occurance and probably not something he would do sober.


Why take a photo of him ? are you the wee police? Just accept we all agree that its not good behaviour and turn a blind eye.

10 May was a Saturday, so the bloke had probably been on the beer for the day. Therefore probably not in a position to make as rational a judgement as some people by the time 830 pm


Curiously, in the days when I used to drink excessive amounts of liquid (beer or not) it was in pubs, well supplied with WCs. But I have been out all day at the weekend (not on a drinking spree), away from home and office and the facilities therein, and had the need to relieve myself. If I hadn't the time or the inclination to go into a pub for a 'drink' it could be a close run thing before I got home - if I had any distance to travel then a damn close run thing. Unless the culprit is a reckless and intentional open-air 'micturoligist' (doubt that word exists) then I would think it is less likely rather than more that he had been on the beer. Such open air frivolity in my experience tended to occur after kicking-out time- when pub loos were no longer available.

@ Mako, please make sure you clearly re-read my post. I stated clearly - I do not appreciate seeing men urinating in public - I do not wish to see male genitalia whilst out walking my dog. At no point did I say anything about smells. What makes this thread absurd is comments such as your own.
Sorry Marley the point maybe should have been I would also say that i do not appreciate seeing dogs urinating in public and do not wish to see their genitalia out whilst walking. However that would be irrelevant like lots of the posts. No-one likes it, no one wants it in their own garden/fence etc hwoever it isnt a big deal and the op was a ridiculous overreaction, with no attempt to find out why the guy was pissing where he was, instead barracking him, photoing him and then posting about him. The poster could avoid seeing the genetalia by moving along, as i would when your dogs piss and crap everywhere.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So the people who don't see this as a big deal

> think it's ok to urinate on artwork? How is that

> discreet?



One man's art is another man's toilet.


But it's clearly not discreet and no one has said it was.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think anyone has said they actually like

> people pissing, they've just said it's not really

> a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

>

> And Nigello, why would not particul;arly caring

> about people having a piss mean that a person's

> house would be grubby? What a stupid thing to

> say.

>

>

> At the ed of the day there are two separate issues

> here as far as I can see.

>

> 1. Is it okay for a person to find somewhere

> discreet to have a wee if they really need to go?

>

> 2. Is it okay to pee right on a pavement in front

> of someone's house or something like that?

>

>

> For me they are two totally different things.

> Trying to find a little dark allyway is very

> different to just getting it out and pissing on

> someone's front fence.



Otta,

You mentioned the word discreet right here.

Making this into an indecent exposure thing is stupid. If the op had left him to empty his 8 pints of Stella up the wall instead of shouting at him and taking his picture, he wouldn't have waved his willy at her in the first place.


Kind of dumb thing to do to be honest, have a go at a guy with his cock out then get all emotional when you see his cock. It was out before you spoke to him, though probably not facing you, so if you didn't want to see it, probably better not to make him turn around by shouting at him.


Common sense really.

The first offence is urinating in a public space.


The second offence (indecent exposure intended to cause harm and/or harassment) is a public order offence.


If damage has been done to the mural or brickwork, that is a criminal damage offence.


Given that the spot overlooks a childrens play area, and the wall he relieved himself on belongs to a restaurant and bar with toilet facilities open at that time of the day, there was no excuse.


Do you say same the thing to women who are flashed at LD? Indecent exposure is indecent exposure no?

And just on the photo thing. If someone breaks into a home, they are breaking the law. If you take a photo or take action to help catch them doing it and they retaliate, are you then at fault for trying to get evidence to convict them? It doesn't matter if the incident is burglary or urinating in a public space. BOTH are against the law. Obviously one has more impact than the other, but the principle is the same.


The OP clearly felt on principle that this is behaviour that she wasn't prepared to tolerate. I can understand that. What I don't understand is why some people have to belittle her experience with mockery. It's ok for people to have different levels of sensibility, and it's certainly ok when the law is of the same view.

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And just on the photo thing. If someone breaks into a home, they are breaking the law. If you

> take a photo or take action to help catch them doing it and they retailiate, are you then at

> fault for trying to get evidence to convict them?


If a child was urinating at the same place as this man, and you take a photo of them (including their genitals), how many years will your name be on the sex offenders register?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...