Jump to content

Recommended Posts

glau Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm also a licence fee payer and heartily dislike

> The Vicar of Dibley. I actually find Dawn French's

> comic stlye offensive. Should we get her

> sacked/suspended? Also don't care for the Antiques

> Roadshow or whatever it is called and I do not

> enjoy Songs of Praise either. I am launching my

> petition now.


I'm with you on this one Glau.

Can I add the Seven O'Clock Show, some of the Newsnight Review, the bands I don't like on the Glastonbury coverage, the bits on the Six O' Clock news that are just puffs for upcoming programmes (and don't get me started on the 'going live to' bollocks, featuring someone standing outside an empty, darkened building), those occasions when John Humphrys' attempts at being jovial and Strictly Come Dancing never doing the 'what's white and moves across the floor?' joke.

Oh and Casualty, I find that so offensive, I've never watched it.


I'm going to hell in a handcart, I tell you.

Just who is RB's target audience anyway?


I would have thought it was more the likes of Glau's daughter above, hijacking mum or pop's account ;), but radio 2 is more traditionally associated with an older audience, just finding the positive qualities in cords and slippers.


For the record I like his football column, but then he is an iron....so to speak.

A bit like Harry Hill really.. his stand-up shows are blisteringly good (especially the small-gig 'material tryouts' he does) but TV peeps seem intent on shoehorning them both into a format supported by tv clip funnies.


In the last-but-one Secret Policemen affair, Russ Brand (and The Boosh) were largely the only acts that made me laugh 'properly' at all.

Is Radio 2?s audience changing perhaps? I mean I?m well young and hip* and I prefer it to Radio 1 mostly because they don?t play so much of that bang-crash music I don?t understand.



*word, brother etc. =<_? (that?s txt spk for the sign I?m making with my fingers)

Wossy started out as a broadcaster who was willing to push boundaries, but hasn't got to where he is simply by being controversial, for quite while he's gone up the ranks via his more mainstream material with just an added but ersatz veneer of edginess. He's an intelligent, witty and affable chap though and good at what he does.


I'm really not a fan of his 'flagship' show, it seems to be horribly luvvy and despite appearances of being rude and risque is actually horribly fawning, and utterly standard chat show fare once it's stripped down to its components.


But he's every bit as good as Barry Norman on Film xx, he introduced me to so much through the incredibly strange film show and actually seems a pretty decent chap all told.


The problem comes when anyone gets the sort of ludicrous contract he was offered by the Beeb. Ones own self worth hits hyperinflation, and people can be tempted to believe the hype, that the rules no longer apply. I think an element of this has happened to Ross and since Hollywood to Brand.

They're friends and their dinner party humour ended up being recorded and broadcast.

It was not so much in bad taste, that's pretty much a trade mark for both of them in their careers, it was that they blurred the divide between medialand and reality and that generally they really shouldn't actually meet, and that's what happens when you yourself get out of touch with reality.


The fact that it wasn't particularly funny just adds to the woes, but I'm inclined to agree that far worse, far more 'shocking' occurs in print and broadcast media pretty much daily, and that this is a classic case of the hypocritical press getting their teeth into something. Whether to sell papers or not I don't know, I'm never convinced sales fluctuate that much according to the story of the day, I think they just love taking people down.


So end of the day, poor effort on show noone listened to has suddenly equated questions in parliament and national witch hunt.

I'd have thought with an American Presidential election in 4 days time the silly season might be over, I KNOOOW we're all sick to death of hearing the end of the world is nigh, but really, haven't 40,000 people got something better to do with their time? I hear that Jerry Springer the Opera is well worth a watch.

....Indeed, I thnk that 'they' will, although HIGNFY seemed business as normal last night eg "If Jonathonn Ross went to prison for this he'd certainly have to watch his 'Rs'". But the debate seems to have moved away from the relity that most people believe that comedy/satire general rudery can go as close to the edge as it wants but phoning people up and leaving offensive messages on their answer machines is illegal under harrasment laws and rightly so. an attack on this highly offensive behaviour is not an attack on 'comedy'....as the opposite equivalents to the 'Daily Mail' readers seem to keep missing in their branding of all who think RD and JR's behaviour as disgraceful as 'little englanders,, etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...