Jump to content

Recommended Posts

glau Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm also a licence fee payer and heartily dislike

> The Vicar of Dibley. I actually find Dawn French's

> comic stlye offensive. Should we get her

> sacked/suspended? Also don't care for the Antiques

> Roadshow or whatever it is called and I do not

> enjoy Songs of Praise either. I am launching my

> petition now.


I'm with you on this one Glau.

Can I add the Seven O'Clock Show, some of the Newsnight Review, the bands I don't like on the Glastonbury coverage, the bits on the Six O' Clock news that are just puffs for upcoming programmes (and don't get me started on the 'going live to' bollocks, featuring someone standing outside an empty, darkened building), those occasions when John Humphrys' attempts at being jovial and Strictly Come Dancing never doing the 'what's white and moves across the floor?' joke.

Oh and Casualty, I find that so offensive, I've never watched it.


I'm going to hell in a handcart, I tell you.

Just who is RB's target audience anyway?


I would have thought it was more the likes of Glau's daughter above, hijacking mum or pop's account ;), but radio 2 is more traditionally associated with an older audience, just finding the positive qualities in cords and slippers.


For the record I like his football column, but then he is an iron....so to speak.

A bit like Harry Hill really.. his stand-up shows are blisteringly good (especially the small-gig 'material tryouts' he does) but TV peeps seem intent on shoehorning them both into a format supported by tv clip funnies.


In the last-but-one Secret Policemen affair, Russ Brand (and The Boosh) were largely the only acts that made me laugh 'properly' at all.

Is Radio 2?s audience changing perhaps? I mean I?m well young and hip* and I prefer it to Radio 1 mostly because they don?t play so much of that bang-crash music I don?t understand.



*word, brother etc. =<_? (that?s txt spk for the sign I?m making with my fingers)

Wossy started out as a broadcaster who was willing to push boundaries, but hasn't got to where he is simply by being controversial, for quite while he's gone up the ranks via his more mainstream material with just an added but ersatz veneer of edginess. He's an intelligent, witty and affable chap though and good at what he does.


I'm really not a fan of his 'flagship' show, it seems to be horribly luvvy and despite appearances of being rude and risque is actually horribly fawning, and utterly standard chat show fare once it's stripped down to its components.


But he's every bit as good as Barry Norman on Film xx, he introduced me to so much through the incredibly strange film show and actually seems a pretty decent chap all told.


The problem comes when anyone gets the sort of ludicrous contract he was offered by the Beeb. Ones own self worth hits hyperinflation, and people can be tempted to believe the hype, that the rules no longer apply. I think an element of this has happened to Ross and since Hollywood to Brand.

They're friends and their dinner party humour ended up being recorded and broadcast.

It was not so much in bad taste, that's pretty much a trade mark for both of them in their careers, it was that they blurred the divide between medialand and reality and that generally they really shouldn't actually meet, and that's what happens when you yourself get out of touch with reality.


The fact that it wasn't particularly funny just adds to the woes, but I'm inclined to agree that far worse, far more 'shocking' occurs in print and broadcast media pretty much daily, and that this is a classic case of the hypocritical press getting their teeth into something. Whether to sell papers or not I don't know, I'm never convinced sales fluctuate that much according to the story of the day, I think they just love taking people down.


So end of the day, poor effort on show noone listened to has suddenly equated questions in parliament and national witch hunt.

I'd have thought with an American Presidential election in 4 days time the silly season might be over, I KNOOOW we're all sick to death of hearing the end of the world is nigh, but really, haven't 40,000 people got something better to do with their time? I hear that Jerry Springer the Opera is well worth a watch.

....Indeed, I thnk that 'they' will, although HIGNFY seemed business as normal last night eg "If Jonathonn Ross went to prison for this he'd certainly have to watch his 'Rs'". But the debate seems to have moved away from the relity that most people believe that comedy/satire general rudery can go as close to the edge as it wants but phoning people up and leaving offensive messages on their answer machines is illegal under harrasment laws and rightly so. an attack on this highly offensive behaviour is not an attack on 'comedy'....as the opposite equivalents to the 'Daily Mail' readers seem to keep missing in their branding of all who think RD and JR's behaviour as disgraceful as 'little englanders,, etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one place  it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...