Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I would just like to state for the record that

> I

> > was a fan of satanic sluts before they went

> > mainstream.

>

> They were good when they were on Alternative

> Tentacles.


Eh? You mean they're some sort of band? I thought it was just a lifestyle choice.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

He was lined up to be interviewed on the show.

It was when if didnt do the interview that they started to call him back with the silly voice mails


Hell hath no fury like a Wossy scorned...


p.s.Sean: Hope you did not mind me re-arranging your thoughts as I feel your comments are now easier to read and you will,thus, reach a wider audience accordingly.(tu)

Tony, mobile phone keypads are evil and you are a gent sir


More intelligent opinion than mine can be found here

David MItchell


which I found absolutely spot on. I expected him (as a social conservative) to have taken a different tack but it's hard to disagree with anything he has written


A more obvious, but no less pertinent column from


Charlie Brooker


mines a similar seam

"Readers.. this is a fundamental issue about the disgraceful treatment of a pensioner"

"Ring this number to complain"


Bugger.. the old fool won't play ball. What now?


"Readers.. this is fundamental issue about how the BBC is run"

"Ring this number to complain"


"Ring this number if you're largely incapable of making you're own mind up about anything any need to be told what to get angry about (and why) on a daily basis by a self-serving press which is only too happy to oblige."

Yeah there?s this guy who is an oven chip baron of some sorts. He?s running for Governor General of the American territories. He has hired the fella from Monty Python, lumberjack uniform and all, as the ?face? of his advertising campaign.


The villain is an ex employee of the chip baron. He?s shifty and used his sharp teeth to chew through his tether one night and made a run for the coastal states where his sort are allowed to walk around free as birds in the daylight. He wears a turban, carries a scimitar and spends his days poring over a map of the empire and laughing maniacally.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Viv. Please tell me you are joking with that

> question? He was lined up to be interviewed on the

> show. . . It was when if didnt do the interview

> that they started to call him back with the silly

> voice mails



I wonder why he didn't do the show?

SM, you mean that there are people with vested interests and an agenda out there who would delight in the collapse of the Beeb? I heard that Shrill Asshead Jon Gaunt(medieval name for a medieval attitude)calling for a privatised BBC this morning, the very same BBC that clothed and fed him for a bafflingly long time. Now there is proof positive that Auntie caters for all tastes if ever one was needed.
If you get a chance, pick up a copy of Gaunty's book in Smiths or someplace and have a flick through - it's either hilarious or scary depending on how many people youthink believe this stuff. I'm going with scary based on what I've seen in the last week

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...