Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

Happy to eat my words but I think we'll

> not

> > make it out of the group and not get a win.

> >

> > Just an embarrassment in terms of our standing

> > rather than the actual performance.

> >

> > Rooney drop him and Gerrard not that great

> either.

> > I can't wait for the golden generation to pass!

>

>

> Wot he said - we've gone from dull drawers to

> more exciting losers...we are miles behind the top

> teams, miles.

>

> and I am pretty sure Italy and Urugauay aren't in

> the top teams either....


So based on what you said about Scotland v Costa Rica on the other thread. How confident do you feel now that you will hammer these latin minnows?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Face the facts Otta, hes no Roy Keane.



More than happy to face that fact.


Give me someone not good enough for their country over someone that decides he's too good for his country any day of the week.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Why take Stirling off, he was quiet for a while

> but the Uruguay manager must have breathed a sigh

> of relief at that point."

>

> My reaction too, especially as Sturridge had done

> little but pass meekly to the keeper over and over

> (yeah a little unfair but his finishing was

> woeful).



Becauae Sterling was completely ineffectual. He's another in a long line of average England speed merchants that can beat a player for pace and have a little trickery, but when it comes to a final ball or using their brain are found wanting. File next to Lennon, Walcott, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Townsend. He had novelty factor on his side against italy, but once oppo defences work out how to play him, he's pointless. Besides, he's more effective up the middle, but Rooney was there last night and was our best player.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With Suarez there Uruguay can challenge, without,

> unlikely.

> Italy are boring but excellent, definitely first

> string.


I'd argue against both statements. This is a relatively poor Italy team. Apart from Pirlo, they have no players that would get anywhere near the first xi of a top international side. Uruguay have Cavani and Suarez.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when was the last time we had a decent playmaker?

> Scholes, Sherringham? If we count players who

> could produce for club AND country i guess that

> rules out the former.

>

> Anyone waiting in the ings to fill that

> role...bueller....?


Barkley

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Face the facts Otta, hes no Roy Keane.

>

>

> More than happy to face that fact.

>

> Give me someone not good enough for their country

> over someone that decides he's too good for his

> country any day of the week.



Well said Otta, good lad.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He had novelty factor on his side

> against italy, but once oppo defences work out how

> to play him, he's pointless. Besides, he's more

> effective up the middle, but Rooney was there last

> night and was our best player.



That doesn't make any sense. It's not because defences worked him out, it's because, as you point out, he was played in a different position and didn't have the opportunity to do what he did against Italy.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > when was the last time we had a decent

> playmaker?

> > Scholes, Sherringham? If we count players who

> > could produce for club AND country i guess that

> > rules out the former.

> >

> > Anyone waiting in the ings to fill that

> > role...bueller....?

>

> Barkley



Hmmm, hope you're right, but he got a fair run out last night and didn't really do anything to set the world on fire.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "but when it comes to a final ball or using their

> brain are found wanting"

>

> That summed up everyone though, so why favour one

> over another? pace and trickery are at least a

> start!


because it's that one player that everyone seems to be selling as the big hope for the future


i think sturridge is a better prospect

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He had novelty factor on his side

> > against italy, but once oppo defences work out

> how

> > to play him, he's pointless. Besides, he's more

> > effective up the middle, but Rooney was there

> last

> > night and was our best player.

>

>

> That doesn't make any sense. It's not because

> defences worked him out, it's because, as you

> point out, he was played in a different position

> and didn't have the opportunity to do what he did

> against Italy.



he came inside often enough last night to no effect

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am confident we'd hammer Scotland


Delusion!


Well you didn't at Wembley in August (3-2 after a late goal) and frankly you're even worse now.

England are like a wounded duck and we are playing our best since 2008. 27 in Fifa rankings vs 70 for the Republic of Ireland and...yes above Costa Rica.


On the plus side you can only get better once your Golden Generation shuffle off to do telly instead.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Face the facts Otta, hes no Roy Keane.

>

>

> More than happy to face that fact.

>

> Give me someone not good enough for their country

> over someone that decides he's too good for his

> country any day of the week.


So Keane returned to international football why? He wouldn't have done that if he thought he was too good for his country.

no point taking players like Cole (good as he was/is - he isn't available for much longer)


This cup is about trying out the younger players and building on that


before the tournament started people were saying "for first time in ages we have no real expectation"


After 2 narrow defeats to 2 big teams it's all "we should have done x y and z"


everyone should juuuuust calm down. None of it matters. But if it does, the long term is the goal


knee-jerk reactions to 2 matches is exactly the sort of thing that has the national team where they are

What SJ said, big time.


Although Baines was pretty shit last night. Johnson had a pretty good match going forward, but he's still very iffy at the back.


titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> he came inside often enough last night to no

> effect



Coming inside is different to being in there all the time IMO. But I'm not an expert I'll freely admit.


Mick Mack, I assumed you were teasing, but couldn't let that go unanswered ;-)

Stuart Pearce made what I thought was a very valid point about England not letting their younger players develop through the age groups. As soon as there is a whiff of someone being good, they're promoted to the senior squad. The problem is they usually only get to sit on the bench or in the stands.


Last time England won anything was the U 17's twice in the Euro's in recent years. Reason being is that at that age the players aren't pulled out of selection. At the last U20 WC England had 46 players pull out. Keeping the better players in their under age teams gives them a chance to experience tournament play which in due course will benefit the senior team.


I think most international associations take the under age game seriously.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...