Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shall we try it the other way around and eliminate candidates?


I'll start by suggesting we eliminate the Magnolia. Nice pub, but we need to spread the love and not go there yet again.


*ow, Piers, you can let go of my arm now!*


P.S. cdonline, haven't heard 'none of my beeswax' for donkeys, took me back to school and made me smile.

Sue - did you go tothat Kraftwerk night?? I really fancied it but then forgot about it?


I'm preferring the pubs we haven't been to yet as a suggestion - all of them sound good and liek quids I prefer a beer. But it's Christmas a brave suggestion by Georgia

There was a notice on the door of the Wishing Well last week that said: "We cannot open today due to a problem. Any problems, please call 07xxxxxxxx".


There is currently another notice pointing out that to gain admittance, you have to be over 21, and are not allowed to deal drugs on the premises. I realise this might limit numbers at an EDF meet, so thought you might like to know.

If the Wishing Well is the choice of most then The Wishing Well it can be. Was only thinking it would be good to do something a bit different for the Christmas drinks and go somewhere maybe with a DJ or some sort of music - but that's just me :)

"that's why i suggested the Wishing Well, so everyone can have a clean night for once."


Are you suggesting we normally deal drugs, hit on gymslips or partake of mud-wrestling...or all of the above?

Is there anywhere that would cater for that as it happens?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue - did you go tothat Kraftwerk night?? I really

> fancied it but then forgot about it?

>

xxxxxx


Yes, best night out I'd had for ages, started very very very late but well worth it :)

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that's why i suggested the Wishing Well, so

> everyone can have a clean night for once.


I'm up for the Wishing Well but where's the fun in having a clean night? Bollocks to that!!!

georgia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the Wishing Well is the choice of most then The

> Wishing Well it can be. Was only thinking it would

> be good to do something a bit different for the

> Christmas drinks and go somewhere maybe with a DJ

> or some sort of music - but that's just me :)


The one and only time I've been in the Adventure, that Toby chap was telling us that he was trying to encourage dancing and suchlike, although apparently he's not having much luck so far.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a notice on the door of the Wishing Well

> last week that said: "We cannot open today due to

> a problem. Any problems, please call 07xxxxxxxx".

>

> There is currently another notice pointing out

> that to gain admittance, you have to be over 21,

> and are not allowed to deal drugs on the premises.

> I realise this might limit numbers at an EDF meet,

> so thought you might like to know.


That was due to having new managers (yet again) and the license needing to be renewed, or something like that anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...