Jump to content

Rebekah Brooks cleared, Andy Coulson found guilty........


Recommended Posts

Mac - he lived practically across the road from me. I'd often see the slimy fecker and the other "gentlemen" of the press camped outside his front door. His house may have gone up for sale two years ago when the case first came to court but I think I can remember quite clearly when the removal vans arrived.
That certainly seems to be the view. Although getting a jury to find the desired verdict can't always be guaranteed, finding a prosecutor and/or witnesses that play ball definitely can be done. Like most people I'm astounded that both Mr and Mrs Brooks were found not guilty. There's no way you can be that high up in a newspaper and not know how stories are being sought and found. I'd totally understand if Coulson feels like the hog roast!
Yes, he seems to have been made the scapegoat because he lied to David Cameron about his involvement in phone hacking when he hired him. Obviously, he's guilty as hell but I fail to see how Rebecca Brooks couldn't have possibly known about what was going on at the paper. She was shagging Coulsen at the time and they worked together very closely. She must have known.

I can't get excited about the whole phone-hacking palaver anyway. Most people (the cops included) didn't think phone hacking was a crime at all, and there are lots of other perfectly legal ways of getting hold of people's private information and splashing it all over the front pages. Even the payoffs for coppers etc. in return for stories are hardly big news - it's been around for ever, and whilst it's definitely not legal I wouldn't class it alongside proper corruption in terms of seriousness.


The Brooks trial was great entertainment (including for the lawyers involved, with the added satisfaction for them of being paid handsomely) but it was never actually important.

Phonehacking blew up because of the Dowler case, full stop.


Would the majority of the public have been up in arms about listening to to the intimate affairs of Boris Johnson, Heather Mills, Prezza, Gazza or The Royals? Would they bollocks! Half the population pay to lap that shit up every day!

So many of the general public have a perverse sense of right and wrong.


One day cackling over Gazza having fallen off the wagon again; the next day 'outraged' at the source of the information.



Does the addict not share some responsibility - along with the dealer?

I was reading the Independent at lunchtime and they said that just about all of the hacking incidences presented at the trial occurred under Coulson's watch. The one exception that was under Brookes' editorial reign, she was conveniently away on holiday at the time.


Make of that what you will.

"Doesn't make it right though."


Obviously. And as it turns out some of it was actually criminal, but still hardly crime of the century. Re Millie Dowler, it was the hacking equivalent of doorstepping the family of a murder victim, which still goes on of course. The point being that it is not the illegality that matters, but the lack of respect/decency. And that's where the hypocrisy comes in - many consumers don't really care about decency or respect in journalism where the victims are unsymapthetic and they want to read the stories.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't make it right though.


Didn't you used to work for a red-top? At any point did you get wind that the paper would go to illegal efforts to get stories? Phone-hacking or anything else? Because anyone I've spoken reckons it's rife and you'd have to live under a rock to not be aware of dodgy goings on.


Yet people still work there and people still buy it.


People suck. *Bob* is spot on with the hypocrisy on the part of most of the public - they want to devour endless celeb-driven drivel yet cry foul when they find out about poor Hugh Grant's phone being hacked. It's as much push from consumers for this dirge that drives the media to ever desperate lengths.


Anyone complaining about this looks at that Daily Mail website sidebar of shame? You're partly to blame for all this. Stop looking at pictures of Kardashians and read a book.

They did.


But the point remains. For many - whether they deserved to get the full weight of the law thrown at them hinged upon whether there was sympathy for the victim (or mostly one victim in particular in this case) - not on a point of law or 'right' and 'wrong'.


If the victims had just been Max Clifford, Heather Mills and George Galloway a ?100m trial would not have been on the cards.


Great to see some unlikeable people squirm in court, but there's a slightly grotty level of schadenfreude, hypocrisy and double standards in play which clearly hasn't occurred to Mr & Mrs Bloke in Street - who've happily spent the last ten years tittering over a picture of Sienna Miller's tits as photographed through a long lens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...