Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ok, several times this week people have told me they have bought the precious rainbow loom bands on amazon. I 've said we don't buy from them due to their tax avoidance. Does anyone know of shops ( any variety of shop) that is definitely paying their dues or not? Is there anywhere I can find this out?


Would like to be consistent, and when people ask for alternatives be able to give good suggestions. I don't just mean for toys, Starbucks is still on my do not use list...


Edited due to terrible typing

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46069-ethical-shopping-tax-avoidance/
Share on other sites

Gray Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By tax avoidance I assume you mean the completely

> legal free movement of capital between EU member

> countries as one of the four founding principles, yes?


Being legal doesn't make something ethical.


Besides, we all have our own individual moral compass... if a company is doing something we don't like, the sensible thing to do is to stop using them.

My point is that is should not even be referred to as tax avoidance. Amazon et al are not avoiding anything. They are using the laws enshrined in the EU Founding Principals. If you think those laws are unethical, then blame the source.


The bleatings of Margaret Hodge and the loss-making Guardian seem to gloss over those facts, though...

Talk of "affording" ethics misses the point of what ethics is


It isn't a product you buy off a shelf


It's doing the right thing even at personal cost (monetary or otherwise)


You paying someone in "cash" is up to you. Onus is on the recipient to do right thing.


It's the old " would you pick up a suitcase with a million quid in it of you knew doing so would kill x number of people" chestnut isn't it

Absolutely. Ultimately this is where 'we' have power and social media can actually work well - not rules/regs/politicians interfering with markets - but, you know, "us the people".


Don't shop at amazon if you think they avoid Corporation tax, and you think that matters...and let them and everyone know.


Don't bank with Barclays/Llyods/RBS, etc if you reall think the bankers caused this mess


Don't use retail businesses that don't pay a living wage if you believe in that

"Article I-4 of the Constitution guarantees the free movement of persons, goods, services and capital within the Union (the famous "four freedoms") and strictly prohibits any discrimination on grounds of nationality.


http://europa.eu/scadplus/constitution/objectives_en.htm


Yup, pretty well hidden "loophole" there.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Talk of "affording" ethics misses the point of

> what ethics is

>

> It isn't a product you buy off a shelf


Oh yes it is.

>

> It's doing the right thing even at personal cost

> (monetary or otherwise)


And if you can't afford it?

>

> You paying someone in "cash" is up to you. Onus is

> on the recipient to do right thing.


Crap. The recipient usually suggests it to keep the price down.

>

> It's the old " would you pick up a suitcase with a

> million quid in it of you knew doing so would kill

> x number of people" chestnut isn't it


No. Nothing like it.

Sorry, no.


Tax Evasion is what it says on the tin, and is breaking the law as written today.


There is no such thing as "tax avoidance within the law". Thats a non sequitur.


The law as written today allows free movement of capital as mentioned. If it wrong in most peoples eyes as you state, then the criticm should be directed toward the people who make the laws, not the people who act upon those laws.


I assume you pay as much tax as you lawfully must do, and no more? Or do you pay whatever spare cash you have left each year to the taxman as a free bonus? After all, thats ethical. Think of the teachersandnurses...

"I assume you pay as much tax as you lawfully must do, and no more? "


I receive frequent calls from financial companies (working for a city bank) asking me how much tax I pay and when I tell them they tell me how much less I could pay. I tell all of them to bugger off


I'm not well off, I earn a decent salary but could do with more money. But it's not right or ethical for me to legally pay less. This country needs everyone to pay as much as they can to get back on it's feet


To pay for (look you're being "funny!!!") teachersandnurse etc the country needs income to increase (austerity is sold as necessary but really it's idealogical)


You want to make money in this UK market, use tax benefits paid for by less well off taxpayers, get the benefit of UK education and infrastructure? Then pay the money. or one day you will run out of customers because they won't be able to afford it

Going back to the Morals are good if you can afford it thing, I tend to agree.


I have filled in MANY DLA claims in my time for people with visual impairments, quite a few with sight no worse than mine. I am confident I could get myself DLA (or whatever it is now) but I never have because I don't feel I really need it, and despite fancying the extra cash, it just feels ethically wrong.


But then I use Amazon all the time because they're ofren the cheapest option and my spare cash is now more limited than it has been since I was about 22.


I know what they do yet I choose to ignore it and continue to use them.


I guess the point is we all draw our kine somewhere, and our personal financial situation plays a huge part in where that might be. If I had more free cash I may well pay out a bit more to ease my conscience further.


But despite using them, I would never try to deny that Amazon actively practice tax avoidance. Legal or not legal, they are selling stuff here and then not paying the tax here for that income. That is avoiding paying tax, the fact it's legal is almost beside the point.


Pay your tax here or move it over there and perfectly legally AVOID paying it. The key word is avoid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • maxxi maxes out. Week 8 points...   Week 8 table...  
    • You may have seen an article in the paper today about Jewish leaders and notables calling on the UN and world leaders to sanction Israel [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/22/jewish-notables-open-letter-un-sanction-israel], "... Prominent Jewish figures around the world are calling on the United Nations and world leaders to impose sanctions on Israel over what they describe as “unconscionable” actions amounting to genocide in Gaza. Over 450 signatories, including former Israeli officials, Oscar winners, authors and intellectuals have signed an open letter demanding accountability over Israel’s conduct in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The letter’s release comes as EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday amid reports they plan to shelve proposals for sanctions over human rights violations. “We have not forgotten that so many of the laws, charters, and conventions established to safeguard and protect all human life were created in response to the Holocaust,” the signatories write. “Those safeguards have been relentlessly violated by Israel.” ..."   There is also a petition we can sign to support them in their call for justice: Direct link: https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/stand_with_jews_demand_action_loc_cp1/?tUwBCsb&v=502713833&cl=22394973010&_checksum=7dc99acb5dd4fc5a43a24e21772f51005ea239753e9ae3033d9f79ffd6119559 "For the first time since the ceasefire, a powerful coalition of Jewish voices have come together, urging world leaders to keep the pressure up until real accountability and freedom are achieved.Their call can shift the political mood and give leaders courage to act decisively -- Amplify their voices and stand with them: The demands of Global Jewish Voices: To respect and abide by the decisions of the International Court of Justice, noting their application also in the West Bank and East Jerusalem; to apply arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court; and to resist efforts to unduly pressure and influence and prevent the workings of both courts. To refuse any complicity in continued crimes and violations of international law against Palestinians by Israel, including by ending the provision of arms and other relevant goods and services; to use relevant leverage, including targeted sanctions on governmental bodies and individuals responsible for violations of international law, and suspension of relations with commercial entities contributing to these violations. To ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches all Palestinians in Gaza at the scale that is commensurate to their vital need, that the blockade is lifted and materials for reconstruction enter, and that there is a full Israeli military withdrawal. To refute false accusations of antisemitism that abusively deploy our collective history to tarnish those with whom we stand together in the pursuit of peace and justice. If you are of Jewish heritage you can also sign here, and we will add the number of your voices to support the Jewish call for justice. Posted: 22 October 2025"  
    • I've actually met Luke Johnson and he's actually a very amicable, witty and extremely clever man. He's also created thousands of jobs and generated millions and millions of pounds of tax revenue for the government, offering goods and hospitality that countless millions of people have enjoyed over the decades. I'm not a fan of Gail's but I'm also not a fan of people who knock down good guys that have contributed a huge amount to this country.  Anyway, French Patisseries and southern hemisphere coffee don't belong on Farmer's markets. 
    • What mandatory action would then be required of them?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...