Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Arrived for drink at The Dog in Dulwich Village to discover upper part of back wall of building caved in this morning at around 11 a.m. - mercifully nobody injured at ground level (lots of people could have been sitting there). Now no restaurant or access to back garden. No more summer barbecue this summer. In view of pending building works to create bijou hotel, Dog's number could be up. Hope not.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46610-the-dog/
Share on other sites

If The Dog was Greene King or a small pub co it could be great. The location, history and interior has carried it along regardless of M&B. But I would welcome a Hotel du Vin provided it keeps a buzzy bar, prices ok-ish and doesn't trash that vintage panelled interior by painting it all black.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46610-the-dog/#findComment-763311
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
    • The problem with the first Southwark leadership election is that two proxy votes were cast, which is against Southwark's own party rules. So that is why the election was re-run. The controversy is in switching to an online as opposed to in person second election. James has causes he vehemently stands for, and it's fair enough if he thinks the local Labour Party is no longer for him. Government is not easy, and there are hard decisions to be made always. London councils have always had a better deal when it comes to central funding, and anyone who travels to the North frequently can see the stark difference. It's that failure to see the bigger picture that I find most surprising about his comments. Sure, as a local councillor he should be always arguing for local needs, but reform of central government funding to give more help to poorer regions has been a long held aim by this Labour Party, and especially since Brexit, where poorer regions benefitting from EU grants lost out.  As always, it will be the public that decides at the ballot box. 
    • I'd be interested to know how else you award points when deciding what party to vote for!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...