Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I went in there on Sunday afternoon and was served immediately. I was shocked I can tell you (and in the small bar too). Later on I went in and bought a round of drinks in the main bar and they repeated the trick. I couldn't believe it. That's rarely happened in the 40 years I've been going in there. I'm still in shock.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went in there on Sunday afternoon and was served

> immediately. I was shocked I can tell you (and in

> the small bar too). Later on I went in and bought

> a round of drinks in the main bar and they

> repeated the trick. I couldn't believe it. That's

> rarely happened in the 40 years I've been going in

> there. I'm still in shock.


xxxxxx


Maybe all the Villagers are at their second houses? :))

If it stops being a pub in at least some capacity it leaves a huge area unpubbed (new word). Especially with no Half Moon or Grove Tavern. Hopefully it will. I've been to plenty of boutique hotels that retain a very serviceable pub/bar (eg Seaview on Isle of Wight, George in Rye). Otherwise Dulwich Village really is the town with no cheer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
    • The problem with the first Southwark leadership election is that two proxy votes were cast, which is against Southwark's own party rules. So that is why the election was re-run. The controversy is in switching to an online as opposed to in person second election. James has causes he vehemently stands for, and it's fair enough if he thinks the local Labour Party is no longer for him. Government is not easy, and there are hard decisions to be made always. London councils have always had a better deal when it comes to central funding, and anyone who travels to the North frequently can see the stark difference. It's that failure to see the bigger picture that I find most surprising about his comments. Sure, as a local councillor he should be always arguing for local needs, but reform of central government funding to give more help to poorer regions has been a long held aim by this Labour Party, and especially since Brexit, where poorer regions benefitting from EU grants lost out.  As always, it will be the public that decides at the ballot box. 
    • I'd be interested to know how else you award points when deciding what party to vote for!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...