Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely that is a punctuation mark indicating the

> end of a sentence which is also bound by the

> constraints of the 4th dimension.


Of course it may well be just as you say, Brendan.

We live in a time when a former BBC political correspondent, becomes a national dancing hero. So anything's possible.

But I'd lay off the mulled wine at breakfast time, if I were you.

Seriously, a couple of Perronis are less of a shock to the system.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You could be right at that....so you'd send your

> glass back complaining about all the spices

> defiling it??


Simon, I stand in awe.

You've devised the best way to get pissed up, for next to bugger all.

The glass is sent back, empty of whatever hooch you had in it, in the first place.

In a strident tone of voice, one informs the barkeep/waiter about the defiling of the wine and demands a refill.

The subsequent refills will be deemed 'not up to snuff', because of the imbalance of the herbs and spices, and oisy-doisy-doh you get as pissed as a bastard for the price of a single glass of mulled wine.

'Mullered For Nothing' as Dire Straits might have sung at their staff Xmas party.

It's just the sort of initiative we need in these "credit crunch" days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...