Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wish would be to include the wider area - most of the pubs I go to seem to be outside SE22 for example - and I have posted a possible wider border. And I hate postcode lottery/snobbery/arbitrariness as well!


But, the line has to be drawn somewhere - and if anyone of us does it it's open to all sorts of disagreements. Whereas if you limit it to a postcode the only possible disagreement is "is that right or wrong?"


So, reluctantly, I'm going along with the SE22 definition. And I think Keef's point clinched it "I doubt organisers of a Peckham awards, of Forest Hill awards would allow someone to noninante the Bishop."

LOL *bob*


Still, I quite like James' idea, would be a good competition if you just had one "best neighbouring business" award!


THE DOG, Hoopers, Ganapati, The Hob, The Duke, The Nun's Head (well I did get one non pub in there), the chocolate shop, and so on.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

As I said before: "The border will be SE22/East

Dulwich only, we have to draw a line somewhere and

the SE22 border seems like the most obvious way to

do it, but we would consider moving it based on

nominations received."


To expand further, say Hoopers gets nominated for

something then we'll include because it's close by

the SE22 border, however if The White Hart in Bath

was nominated then we won't include it because

it's not close by the SE22 border. This seems like

an obvious way to do it to us but please let us

know if you have a better suggestion.


Categories are being decided tomorrow, any more

good suggestions?



Did you all miss this post? :-S It's sorted! :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...