Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wish would be to include the wider area - most of the pubs I go to seem to be outside SE22 for example - and I have posted a possible wider border. And I hate postcode lottery/snobbery/arbitrariness as well!


But, the line has to be drawn somewhere - and if anyone of us does it it's open to all sorts of disagreements. Whereas if you limit it to a postcode the only possible disagreement is "is that right or wrong?"


So, reluctantly, I'm going along with the SE22 definition. And I think Keef's point clinched it "I doubt organisers of a Peckham awards, of Forest Hill awards would allow someone to noninante the Bishop."

LOL *bob*


Still, I quite like James' idea, would be a good competition if you just had one "best neighbouring business" award!


THE DOG, Hoopers, Ganapati, The Hob, The Duke, The Nun's Head (well I did get one non pub in there), the chocolate shop, and so on.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

As I said before: "The border will be SE22/East

Dulwich only, we have to draw a line somewhere and

the SE22 border seems like the most obvious way to

do it, but we would consider moving it based on

nominations received."


To expand further, say Hoopers gets nominated for

something then we'll include because it's close by

the SE22 border, however if The White Hart in Bath

was nominated then we won't include it because

it's not close by the SE22 border. This seems like

an obvious way to do it to us but please let us

know if you have a better suggestion.


Categories are being decided tomorrow, any more

good suggestions?



Did you all miss this post? :-S It's sorted! :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...