Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy a Sunday roast may well have been sold in

> pubs which otherwise didn't do food, but most

> people who ate them didn't specifically go to the

> establishment for it.


Again... not what I remember at all. Pub lunches have been "a thing" for a long long time.


But I realise that evening food is a much more recent development, and doesn't always work. It can seem a bit strange to see a couple desperately trying to enjoy a meal while hemmed in on all sides by people necking drinks and shouting.

and of course tied pubs are hugely undercut by the likes of weatherspoons who have buying clout, and that's where your 'loyal customers' of old school boozers end up.

So tied pubs HAVE to offer something else to get punters through the door as they literally can't offer a cheap pint.

Food is the obvious, comedy, music nights, quizzes, sports (if the sky licence doesn't cripple you first) hopefully a good atmosphere etc, but all have to be incentives to get the buggers to eat


... or drink wine thinking about it; can you keep a couple of places going single handedly Lou?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am old enough to remember when a Sunday Lunctime

> session meant getting there bang on at 12 and

> swift necking before they closed at 2pm with just

> a few roasties (free) on the bar....and a raffle.



And then the horrible wait until opened again at seven.

There was a pub on Meeting House Lane, Peckham (the road down the side of the police station) Havelot Arms (I think that is how it was spelt). Anyway, they used to have the most amazing *free* bar food on a Sunday. You could get every kind of seafood including and I kid you not, caviar and escargot. It was there that I first experienced both those particular foods. But they also did the traditional bar food like roast spuds and prawns and whelks.


Also used to have a chappy touring the pubs of East Dulwich and Peckham selling seafood stuff like jellied eels (yuk!) and roll mops and what have you. You don't see those guys anymore. Another pub tradition gone by the wayside.

El Pibe I could single handedly drink a pub dry so I think any boozer in trouble that what's to offer me a good time get in touch, you'll be back in profit within a day! Jeremy yes pub lunches have always been a thing, but again, it was a very limited menu of mostly sandwiches maybe a pasty. Sunday was always the day for food, free roasties nuts crisps and prawns at the bar. You can't even stand at the pub in half these poncy ED pubs these days, let alone have a munch on some free food! And yes Millhaven fond memories of the travelling fishmonger popping in with lots of seafood in little pots with salt and vinegar yum. Anyone else remember the guy in the stand alone van outside the a Kings on the Rye pub/nightclub throughout the 80s?


Louisa.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't it less a case of 'being old enough to

> remember' and more a case of 'being older and

> remembering what you did when you were young'?


Not really... more a case of debunking this idea that only new-fangled pubs serve food, and back-in-the-day you could only get a pint of mild and a punch in the face.


Clearly remember sunday roasts and family friendly pub gardens in the mid-80s. I guess that sort of behaviour hadn't reached South London (or Stevenage) yet.

oh no, food was there (bad roasts, prawn cocktails etc), in the fox or the chimnies, it's just my family weren't really pub goers, and by the time I started frequenting them it was only to get drunk, hopefully laid, but far more likely to spectate someone getting their teeth knocked out or dragged across the car park under a car.


From what I gather that's still pretty much par for the course in Stevenage, but Hitchin has somewhat gentrified.

Letchworth barely even *had* a pub until I left it!!! (old quaker town, peaceful folk, but stickinthemuds when it came to boozing)

Not the food thing, Jez. More the sitting-around-in-a-pub-all-day thing.


I remember the food thing exactly as you do: the family went down the pub on a Saturday for a meal, no change to now.


The main change was that - back then - the men would also often go down the pub just with each other three (or four) other nights of the week as well.

I should have copyrighted that photo.



Louisa, whilst I basically agree with your taste in a pub, the fact it that they just can't afford to stay open anymore without doing food or something to bring extra cash in.


As I said earlier, the only reason the Castle is doing well now is


1. They inherited lots of custom from closed / changed places.

2. They are the only place around that stretch to watch football.


Reopen the CPT, Uplands, and old mag and they'd just be sharing those customers.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am old enough to remeber when a Sunday Lunctime

> session menat getting there bang on at 12 and

> swift necking before they closed at 2pm with just

> a few roasties (free) on the bar....and a raffle


Loved those times too ????'s


Meat raffle, a few snacks a look at the landlady's crepe cleavage all dangling with sovereigns


Yep, they were the proper Sunday boozer days

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...