Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, I think everybody is struggling to

> understand your point! Different people like

> different things, isn't it as simple as that?


It's also about how you make a point. As has previously been said, doing it in a sneery, derisory manner about the place and people that gave you your 'fortune' is never going to win many plaudits...

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:


> > > No she thinks that having a home which looks

> > out

> > > on to rolling hill and countryside, with

> quiet

> > > clean streets, and friendly locals is better

> > than

> > > living in London, with a property overlooking

> > the

> > > property opposite, streets full of litter,

> > > overcrowding, overpricing, ............shall

> I

> > > continue?

> >

> > No please don't, i'm feeling uncomfortable for

> > her/you, and i'm also wondering how much of

> this

> > isn't about "her"

> >

> > I'm also getting the resentful-renter vibe here

> > too

>

> Resentful renter? Are you on glue?


On glue ?


What's that supposed to mean, really ?


The feeling i'm getting is someone who's disenchanted with where they live, which is fine. But if you've invested in an area both structurally and emotionally, then that's at odds with most others who've done the same. It's a good and ever changing area, overall


However, if you're in the position of seeing property values climb beyond your reach, as many people are in London, then that's a different perspective.

I'm also sure that if you took a straw pole of those people who have moved to, or continues to live here, then they'd have a more positive view of their choices, investment and area


And the friend from the rolling hills, she's happy with her lot now I see. Except it seems a bit disingenuous, to have made so much from an investment her family made, only to come back and bad mouth the very place of her good fortune


Are you sure it's not you, projecting your feelings through her ?


Maybe copy her in, then "she" could express her views in person

Leaving aside these conceptually challenging concepts such as 'capital city' and 'rural england' for a moment:


Assuming trading-in a house on Dunstans for a rustic idyll was at least as great a swap twenty years ago as it is now - doesn't that mean she herself was an idiot for many years - right up until the point she wised-up and left the shithole?


Or has she declared herself the last non-idiot to leave town?

So surely just as the city is not for everyone, neither are the rolling hills and agricultural odours of Herefordshire.


I would agree that some people appear to have an over-inflated opinion of ED. But that doesn't mean it's a bad place to live, or that anyone who hasn't cashed in and upped sticks is a mug. If you want to live in London and can't/won't spend over a million for a house... it's as good an option as any.

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought this was about the best boozer in East

> Dulwich ????? Bob S


Erm...it is


And without further ado ..


"The Best Boozer in East Dulwich" goes jointly to...


Jah & Louisa


Jah could I believe, take anyone on and knock 'em down & Louisa in her own words could "drink a pub dry"


Congrats

  • 2 weeks later...

While East Dulwich, West Dulwich and Dulwich Village are separate districts, surely they all fall within the area of Dulwich.


I don't think it's the same situation as somewhere like Hampstead, where "Hampstead" and "Hampstead Village" are synonymous, and South & West Hampstead are considered separate areas. See also Kensington.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought that re ULEZ, but actually other places do have similar schemes, eg Bristol. I got caught by this a couple of years ago when Google maps sent me through Bristol en route to somewhere else. Though I did manage to get the fine waived. And other places are apparently going to have them, eg Oxford. As I found when I was considering selling the car in Oxford. Which I think is a very good thing, but not helpful if your car isn't compliant  Also in order to sell it I would presumably have to get it into working order, so I'd have to buy a new battery anyway. I use mostly buses and trains already, for travelling both within and outside London.  That's why I rarely use the car except for transporting bulky/heavy items, or going to places which aren't easy to reach via public transport, or giving people a lift who are not very mobile. The problem with hiring a car to go to a festival, for example,  is that I'd be paying for it to sit in a field for several days. And it would be impossible, or at least very difficult,  to transport a tent and camping equipment there by public transport. Not that I've been to any festivals lately. I think I'm talking myself into keeping the car. I did do sums when ULEZ came in. I've had a Freedom Pass for over fifteen years, gulp 😂
    • We used to have local councillors posting on this forum - are there any who are still members?
    • I've never owned a car in the 25 years I've lived in London.  I would regard it as  a hopeless waste of money  I walk, get public transport and taxis for the rare occasions when public transport won't cut it. Anything large that needs to be transporting to or away from my property - well pretty much all shops deliver and for anything  else  there is always someone who willing do it for a small fee. If I need a car to go somewhere outside of London (you would be surprised at how little this issue occurs) then hire cars exist.
    • Hi, we're in a similar position with our old people carrier and did a look back at our usage and then looked at the costs for car clubs, taxis and car hire costs if we got rid of it. In our case the away trips to family, especially during school holidays, makes it cheaper to keep ours and pay ULEZ (the away trips is the big cost for hiring). We rarely use it for local trips and plan usage to aim for multiple purpose trips. We also share with our neighbours such as moving large items with our people carrier and share the ulez cost. Generally for low use alone it will not make financial sense to buy a newer car. Also, if you have a petrol car check its NOx output amount for ULEZ compliance as TFL wrongly categorised many older cars. Did this for neighbours 2001 car and it's ULEZ compliant when TFL originally said it was not (now fixed) and having the same issue with a 1997 petrol car.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...